Green Public Procurement (GPP) is a key tool in European strategies to promote sustainability in public procurement. This study examines the integration of GPP criteria in the National Action Plans (NAPs) of the European Union Member States, with a focus on the construction and urbanizing fields. Through a comparative analysis of policies and regulatory instruments, the main differences in terms of mandatory application between countries in the monitoring and implementation of GPP are highlighted. The comparative analysis of 27 countries reveals significant variation in mandatory execution, regulatory frameworks and monitoring mechanisms. This study proposes an integrated set of indicators that align GPP performance with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the 2030 Agenda, providing an holistic framework for the evaluation of policy and strategic planning. The research also explores the role of environmental performance indicators—such as energy efficiency, CO2 emissions reduction and the use of sustainable construction materials—highlighting how these criteria support the ecological transition and contribute to the achievement of the EU climate objectives. The findings offer insights to strengthen the strategic role of GPP in sustainable environmental and territorial planning.

To What Extent Are the Green Public Procurement Criteria in National Policies and Action Plans? Commonalities Across European Countries for Environmentally Harmonized Valuations / Guarini, Maria Rosaria; Ghiani, Giulia; Sica, Francesco. - In: LAND. - ISSN 2073-445X. - 14:6(2025). [10.3390/land14061215]

To What Extent Are the Green Public Procurement Criteria in National Policies and Action Plans? Commonalities Across European Countries for Environmentally Harmonized Valuations

Guarini, Maria Rosaria
;
Ghiani, Giulia;Sica, Francesco
2025

Abstract

Green Public Procurement (GPP) is a key tool in European strategies to promote sustainability in public procurement. This study examines the integration of GPP criteria in the National Action Plans (NAPs) of the European Union Member States, with a focus on the construction and urbanizing fields. Through a comparative analysis of policies and regulatory instruments, the main differences in terms of mandatory application between countries in the monitoring and implementation of GPP are highlighted. The comparative analysis of 27 countries reveals significant variation in mandatory execution, regulatory frameworks and monitoring mechanisms. This study proposes an integrated set of indicators that align GPP performance with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the 2030 Agenda, providing an holistic framework for the evaluation of policy and strategic planning. The research also explores the role of environmental performance indicators—such as energy efficiency, CO2 emissions reduction and the use of sustainable construction materials—highlighting how these criteria support the ecological transition and contribute to the achievement of the EU climate objectives. The findings offer insights to strengthen the strategic role of GPP in sustainable environmental and territorial planning.
2025
green public procurement; minimum environmental criteria; comparative analysis
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
To What Extent Are the Green Public Procurement Criteria in National Policies and Action Plans? Commonalities Across European Countries for Environmentally Harmonized Valuations / Guarini, Maria Rosaria; Ghiani, Giulia; Sica, Francesco. - In: LAND. - ISSN 2073-445X. - 14:6(2025). [10.3390/land14061215]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Guarini MR_Green-Public-Criteria_2025.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: Full test
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.66 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.66 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1748944
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact