Introduction: The aim of this study was to validate the Italian version of the workplace ostracism scale (WOS), developed by Ferris and colleagues. Workplace ostracism (WO)—the perception of being ignored or excluded by colleagues or supervisors—is a painful experience that negatively impacts employees and the whole organization. We tested the unidimensional structure of the Italian WOS, its independence of social desirability issues, and invariance across genders and ages. We also tested the nomological validity of the WOS by considering ostracism as a job demand and including it in the job demands-resources (JD-R) theory. Method: A sample of Italian employees (N = 653), working for different organizations in several Italian regions, completed an online questionnaire. Data were analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Network analysis was applied to test the nomological validity of the scale. Results: Findings confirmed the unifactor structure of the Italian WOS and its invariance. Social desirability only absorbed a limited portion of variance of ostracism items. Data also supported the nomological validity of the WOS, that is, the expected association of ostracism with basic need frustration, lower work engagement, altruism, and performance. Discussion: In the discussion, we clarified the advantages of conceiving ostracism as a job demand and using network analysis to verify the JD-R theory. Practical implications of findings in order to contain workplace ostracism were commented.

Italian validation of the workplace ostracism scale (WOS) / Colledani, D.; De Carlo, A.; Falvo, R.; Capozza, D.. - In: FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY. - ISSN 1664-1078. - 16:(2025). [10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1584118]

Italian validation of the workplace ostracism scale (WOS)

Colledani D.
Methodology
;
2025

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to validate the Italian version of the workplace ostracism scale (WOS), developed by Ferris and colleagues. Workplace ostracism (WO)—the perception of being ignored or excluded by colleagues or supervisors—is a painful experience that negatively impacts employees and the whole organization. We tested the unidimensional structure of the Italian WOS, its independence of social desirability issues, and invariance across genders and ages. We also tested the nomological validity of the WOS by considering ostracism as a job demand and including it in the job demands-resources (JD-R) theory. Method: A sample of Italian employees (N = 653), working for different organizations in several Italian regions, completed an online questionnaire. Data were analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Network analysis was applied to test the nomological validity of the scale. Results: Findings confirmed the unifactor structure of the Italian WOS and its invariance. Social desirability only absorbed a limited portion of variance of ostracism items. Data also supported the nomological validity of the WOS, that is, the expected association of ostracism with basic need frustration, lower work engagement, altruism, and performance. Discussion: In the discussion, we clarified the advantages of conceiving ostracism as a job demand and using network analysis to verify the JD-R theory. Practical implications of findings in order to contain workplace ostracism were commented.
2025
Italian WOS; job demands-resources theory; network analysis; nomological validity of the Italian WOS; workplace ostracism; workplace ostracism as a demand
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Italian validation of the workplace ostracism scale (WOS) / Colledani, D.; De Carlo, A.; Falvo, R.; Capozza, D.. - In: FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY. - ISSN 1664-1078. - 16:(2025). [10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1584118]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1748121
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact