According to the European Union (EU) Directive 2005/36, the medical specialty of oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) exists with two possible formats: dual degree OMFS called Dental, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (DOMFS) - basic medical and basic dental training and single medical degree Maxillofacial Surgery (MFS). Within the EU and across all of Europe, differences in the nature and quality of OMFS training coexist. By implementing the highest possible standards of training, patient care can be improved. To establish quality metrics for an ideal OMFS training programme, the European OMFS Trainee Forum of the Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes (UEMS) conducted a Delphi consensus protocol from November 2023 to January 2024. Facilitated by the OMFS Section of UEMS, 57 trainees from 32 countries participated. The process involved the definition of three quality levels using the red, amber, and green (RAG) rating system. Following the Delphi process, 46 domains were identified, including features within training programmes/rotations, teaching and education programmes, training placements, recording of training progression and activity, and external assessment of training programmes. The results were aligned with the UEMS OMFS European Training Requirement (ETR). With the introduction of a RAG rating, trainees and trainers can review their training programmes with the aim of improving them by moving domains from Red to Green. Raising the standard of training will benefit our patients. This initiative could mark a significant step towards the harmonisation of OMFS training, improving quality and ensuring consistent, high-level care throughout Europe.

European quality markers in oral and maxillofacial surgery specialty training: defining standards / Puladi, Behrus; Stephanus Brandsma, Dirk; Tavakoli, Milad; Celep, Emre; Taylor, Richard; Amiraliye, Kenan; Apse, Ingus; Aragón Niño, Íñigo; Balint, Gergely; Barbulescu, Vlad; Becker, Philipp; Berens, Jeff; Birk, Anže; Bondi, Thomas; Bouland, Cyril; Britton, Danielle; Brus Madsen, Frey; Chargi, Najiba; Chatzopoulos, Georgios; Chrysostomidis, Anestis; Croonenborghs, Tomas-Marijn; Di Giorgio, Danilo; Domi, Mjellma; Filippi, Andrea; Gruber, Lennart; Hosamaldin, Sayf; Isufi, Renato; Kaczynski, Filip; Kivimaa, Tiiu; Knutsen, Guro; Kull, Kristina; Lackova, Eva; Lamçe, Ledja; Lillestik, Taur; Louizakis, Alexandros; Mehrjoh, Nima; Moors, Jasper; Neiva-Sousa, Manuel; Ochyra, Dorota; Öztürk Muhtar, Merve; Paasché, Agnès; Roshni Patel, Nutan; Prikule, Ilze; Puiu, Tudor; Ramadani, Visar; Rašić, Mario; Rios, Olina; Romanova, Anna; Rooyer, Jacelyn; Sexton, Paul; Sommacal, Adelita; Stankevičius, Dominykas; Thiem, Daniel; Toivari, Miika; Urhan Güçlü, Şeydanur; Watson, Lara; Lemma, Francesco. - In: BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY. - ISSN 0266-4356. - 62:9(2024), pp. 769-779. [10.1016/j.bjoms.2024.06.002]

European quality markers in oral and maxillofacial surgery specialty training: defining standards

Di Giorgio, Danilo;
2024

Abstract

According to the European Union (EU) Directive 2005/36, the medical specialty of oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) exists with two possible formats: dual degree OMFS called Dental, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (DOMFS) - basic medical and basic dental training and single medical degree Maxillofacial Surgery (MFS). Within the EU and across all of Europe, differences in the nature and quality of OMFS training coexist. By implementing the highest possible standards of training, patient care can be improved. To establish quality metrics for an ideal OMFS training programme, the European OMFS Trainee Forum of the Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes (UEMS) conducted a Delphi consensus protocol from November 2023 to January 2024. Facilitated by the OMFS Section of UEMS, 57 trainees from 32 countries participated. The process involved the definition of three quality levels using the red, amber, and green (RAG) rating system. Following the Delphi process, 46 domains were identified, including features within training programmes/rotations, teaching and education programmes, training placements, recording of training progression and activity, and external assessment of training programmes. The results were aligned with the UEMS OMFS European Training Requirement (ETR). With the introduction of a RAG rating, trainees and trainers can review their training programmes with the aim of improving them by moving domains from Red to Green. Raising the standard of training will benefit our patients. This initiative could mark a significant step towards the harmonisation of OMFS training, improving quality and ensuring consistent, high-level care throughout Europe.
2024
Delphi consensus; european training requirements; quality standards; surgical training
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01g Articolo di rassegna (Review)
European quality markers in oral and maxillofacial surgery specialty training: defining standards / Puladi, Behrus; Stephanus Brandsma, Dirk; Tavakoli, Milad; Celep, Emre; Taylor, Richard; Amiraliye, Kenan; Apse, Ingus; Aragón Niño, Íñigo; Balint, Gergely; Barbulescu, Vlad; Becker, Philipp; Berens, Jeff; Birk, Anže; Bondi, Thomas; Bouland, Cyril; Britton, Danielle; Brus Madsen, Frey; Chargi, Najiba; Chatzopoulos, Georgios; Chrysostomidis, Anestis; Croonenborghs, Tomas-Marijn; Di Giorgio, Danilo; Domi, Mjellma; Filippi, Andrea; Gruber, Lennart; Hosamaldin, Sayf; Isufi, Renato; Kaczynski, Filip; Kivimaa, Tiiu; Knutsen, Guro; Kull, Kristina; Lackova, Eva; Lamçe, Ledja; Lillestik, Taur; Louizakis, Alexandros; Mehrjoh, Nima; Moors, Jasper; Neiva-Sousa, Manuel; Ochyra, Dorota; Öztürk Muhtar, Merve; Paasché, Agnès; Roshni Patel, Nutan; Prikule, Ilze; Puiu, Tudor; Ramadani, Visar; Rašić, Mario; Rios, Olina; Romanova, Anna; Rooyer, Jacelyn; Sexton, Paul; Sommacal, Adelita; Stankevičius, Dominykas; Thiem, Daniel; Toivari, Miika; Urhan Güçlü, Şeydanur; Watson, Lara; Lemma, Francesco. - In: BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY. - ISSN 0266-4356. - 62:9(2024), pp. 769-779. [10.1016/j.bjoms.2024.06.002]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Puladi_European-quality-markers_2024.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 3.78 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.78 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1748023
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact