Objectives: To evaluate a deep-learning algorithm for automated coronary artery analysis on ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting detector coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography and compared its performance to expert readers using invasive coronary angiography as reference. Methods: Thirty-two patients (mean age 68.6 years; 81 % male) underwent both energy-integrating detector and ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting detector CT within 30 days. Expert readers scored each image using the Coronary Artery Disease–Reporting and Data System classification, and compared to invasive angiography. After a three-month wash-out, one reader reanalyzed the photon-counting detector CT images assisted by the algorithm. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, inter-reader agreement, and reading times were recorded for each method. Results: On 401 arterial segments, inter-reader agreement improved from substantial (κ = 0.75) on energy-integrating detector CT to near-perfect (κ = 0.86) on photon-counting detector CT. The algorithm alone achieved 85 % sensitivity, 91 % specificity, and 90 % accuracy on energy-integrating detector CT, and 85 %, 96 %, and 95 % on photon-counting detector CT. Compared to invasive angiography on photon-counting detector CT, manual and automated reads had similar sensitivity (67 %), but manual assessment slightly outperformed regarding specificity (85 % vs. 79 %) and accuracy (84 % vs. 78 %). When the reader was assisted by the algorithm, specificity rose to 97 % (p < 0.001), accuracy to 95 %, and reading time decreased by 54 % (p < 0.001). Conclusion: This deep-learning algorithm demonstrates high agreement with experts and improved diagnostic performance on photon-counting detector CT. Expert review augmented by the algorithm further increases specificity and dramatically reduces interpretation time.
Automated coronary analysis in ultrahigh-spatial resolution photon-counting detector CT angiography: clinical validation and intra-individual comparison with energy-integrating detector CT / Kravchenko, Dmitrij; Hagar, Muhammad Taha; Varga-Szemes, Akos; Schoepf, U Joseph; Schoebinger, Max; O'Doherty, Jim; Gülsün, Mehmet Akif; Laghi, Andrea; Laux, Gerald Siegfried; Vecsey-Nagy, Milan; Emrich, Tilman; Tremamunno, Giuseppe. - In: JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY. - ISSN 1876-861X. - 19:5(2025), pp. 576-584. [10.1016/j.jcct.2025.08.006]
Automated coronary analysis in ultrahigh-spatial resolution photon-counting detector CT angiography: clinical validation and intra-individual comparison with energy-integrating detector CT
Laghi, Andrea;Tremamunno, GiuseppeUltimo
2025
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate a deep-learning algorithm for automated coronary artery analysis on ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting detector coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography and compared its performance to expert readers using invasive coronary angiography as reference. Methods: Thirty-two patients (mean age 68.6 years; 81 % male) underwent both energy-integrating detector and ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting detector CT within 30 days. Expert readers scored each image using the Coronary Artery Disease–Reporting and Data System classification, and compared to invasive angiography. After a three-month wash-out, one reader reanalyzed the photon-counting detector CT images assisted by the algorithm. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, inter-reader agreement, and reading times were recorded for each method. Results: On 401 arterial segments, inter-reader agreement improved from substantial (κ = 0.75) on energy-integrating detector CT to near-perfect (κ = 0.86) on photon-counting detector CT. The algorithm alone achieved 85 % sensitivity, 91 % specificity, and 90 % accuracy on energy-integrating detector CT, and 85 %, 96 %, and 95 % on photon-counting detector CT. Compared to invasive angiography on photon-counting detector CT, manual and automated reads had similar sensitivity (67 %), but manual assessment slightly outperformed regarding specificity (85 % vs. 79 %) and accuracy (84 % vs. 78 %). When the reader was assisted by the algorithm, specificity rose to 97 % (p < 0.001), accuracy to 95 %, and reading time decreased by 54 % (p < 0.001). Conclusion: This deep-learning algorithm demonstrates high agreement with experts and improved diagnostic performance on photon-counting detector CT. Expert review augmented by the algorithm further increases specificity and dramatically reduces interpretation time.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Kravchenko_Automated_2025.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
4.78 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.78 MB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
|
Kravchenko_Automated_2025.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
4.79 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.79 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


