Objectives: To evaluate a deep-learning algorithm for automated coronary artery analysis on ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting detector coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography and compared its performance to expert readers using invasive coronary angiography as reference. Methods: Thirty-two patients (mean age 68.6 years; 81 ​% male) underwent both energy-integrating detector and ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting detector CT within 30 days. Expert readers scored each image using the Coronary Artery Disease–Reporting and Data System classification, and compared to invasive angiography. After a three-month wash-out, one reader reanalyzed the photon-counting detector CT images assisted by the algorithm. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, inter-reader agreement, and reading times were recorded for each method. Results: On 401 arterial segments, inter-reader agreement improved from substantial (κ ​= ​0.75) on energy-integrating detector CT to near-perfect (κ ​= ​0.86) on photon-counting detector CT. The algorithm alone achieved 85 ​% sensitivity, 91 ​% specificity, and 90 ​% accuracy on energy-integrating detector CT, and 85 ​%, 96 ​%, and 95 ​% on photon-counting detector CT. Compared to invasive angiography on photon-counting detector CT, manual and automated reads had similar sensitivity (67 ​%), but manual assessment slightly outperformed regarding specificity (85 ​% vs. 79 ​%) and accuracy (84 ​% vs. 78 ​%). When the reader was assisted by the algorithm, specificity rose to 97 ​% (p ​< ​0.001), accuracy to 95 ​%, and reading time decreased by 54 ​% (p ​< ​0.001). Conclusion: This deep-learning algorithm demonstrates high agreement with experts and improved diagnostic performance on photon-counting detector CT. Expert review augmented by the algorithm further increases specificity and dramatically reduces interpretation time.

Automated coronary analysis in ultrahigh-spatial resolution photon-counting detector CT angiography: clinical validation and intra-individual comparison with energy-integrating detector CT / Kravchenko, Dmitrij; Hagar, Muhammad Taha; Varga-Szemes, Akos; Schoepf, U Joseph; Schoebinger, Max; O'Doherty, Jim; Gülsün, Mehmet Akif; Laghi, Andrea; Laux, Gerald Siegfried; Vecsey-Nagy, Milan; Emrich, Tilman; Tremamunno, Giuseppe. - In: JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY. - ISSN 1876-861X. - 19:5(2025), pp. 576-584. [10.1016/j.jcct.2025.08.006]

Automated coronary analysis in ultrahigh-spatial resolution photon-counting detector CT angiography: clinical validation and intra-individual comparison with energy-integrating detector CT

Laghi, Andrea;Tremamunno, Giuseppe
Ultimo
2025

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate a deep-learning algorithm for automated coronary artery analysis on ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting detector coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography and compared its performance to expert readers using invasive coronary angiography as reference. Methods: Thirty-two patients (mean age 68.6 years; 81 ​% male) underwent both energy-integrating detector and ultrahigh-resolution photon-counting detector CT within 30 days. Expert readers scored each image using the Coronary Artery Disease–Reporting and Data System classification, and compared to invasive angiography. After a three-month wash-out, one reader reanalyzed the photon-counting detector CT images assisted by the algorithm. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, inter-reader agreement, and reading times were recorded for each method. Results: On 401 arterial segments, inter-reader agreement improved from substantial (κ ​= ​0.75) on energy-integrating detector CT to near-perfect (κ ​= ​0.86) on photon-counting detector CT. The algorithm alone achieved 85 ​% sensitivity, 91 ​% specificity, and 90 ​% accuracy on energy-integrating detector CT, and 85 ​%, 96 ​%, and 95 ​% on photon-counting detector CT. Compared to invasive angiography on photon-counting detector CT, manual and automated reads had similar sensitivity (67 ​%), but manual assessment slightly outperformed regarding specificity (85 ​% vs. 79 ​%) and accuracy (84 ​% vs. 78 ​%). When the reader was assisted by the algorithm, specificity rose to 97 ​% (p ​< ​0.001), accuracy to 95 ​%, and reading time decreased by 54 ​% (p ​< ​0.001). Conclusion: This deep-learning algorithm demonstrates high agreement with experts and improved diagnostic performance on photon-counting detector CT. Expert review augmented by the algorithm further increases specificity and dramatically reduces interpretation time.
2025
Artificial intelligence; CT angiography; coronary artery disease-reporting and data system; deep learning; photon-counting detector-CT; ultrahigh-spatial resolution
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Automated coronary analysis in ultrahigh-spatial resolution photon-counting detector CT angiography: clinical validation and intra-individual comparison with energy-integrating detector CT / Kravchenko, Dmitrij; Hagar, Muhammad Taha; Varga-Szemes, Akos; Schoepf, U Joseph; Schoebinger, Max; O'Doherty, Jim; Gülsün, Mehmet Akif; Laghi, Andrea; Laux, Gerald Siegfried; Vecsey-Nagy, Milan; Emrich, Tilman; Tremamunno, Giuseppe. - In: JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY. - ISSN 1876-861X. - 19:5(2025), pp. 576-584. [10.1016/j.jcct.2025.08.006]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Kravchenko_Automated_2025.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 4.78 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.78 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore
Kravchenko_Automated_2025.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 4.79 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.79 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1747902
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact