Purpose To evaluate diagnostic accuracy and image quality of deep learning (DL) cine sequences for LV and RV parameters compared to conventional balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) cine sequences in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Material and methods From January to April 2024, patients with clinically indicated CMR were prospectively included. LV and RV were segmented from short-axis bSSFP and DL cine sequences. LV and RV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (EDV), stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction, and LV end-diastolic mass were calculated. The acquisition time of both sequences was registered. Results were compared with paired-samples t test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Agreement between DL cine and bSSFP was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. Image quality was graded by two readers based on blood-to-myocardium contrast, endocardial edge definition, and motion artifacts, using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = insufficient quality; 5 = excellent quality). Results Sixty-two patients were included (mean age: 47 +/- 17 years, 41 men). No significant differences between DL cine and bSSFP were found for all LV and RV parameters (P >= .176). DL cine was significantly faster (1.35 +/- .55 m vs 2.83 +/- .79 m; P < .001). The agreement between DL cine and bSSFP was strong, with bias ranging from 45 to 1.75% for LV and from - 0.38 to 2.43% for RV. Among LV parameters, the highest agreement was obtained for ESV and SV, which fell within the acceptable limit of agreement (LOA) in 84% of cases. EDV obtained the highest agreement among RV parameters, falling within the acceptable LOA in 90% of cases. Overall image quality was comparable (median: 5, IQR: 4-5; P = .330), while endocardial edge definition of DL cine (median: 4, IQR: 4-5) was lower than bSSFP (median: 5, IQR: 4-5; P = .002). Conclusion DL cine allows fast and accurate quantification of LV and RV parameters and comparable image quality with conventional bSSFP.
Accelerated deep learning-based function assessment in cardiovascular magnetic resonance / De Santis, D.; Fanelli, F.; Pugliese, L.; Bona, G. G.; Polidori, T.; Santangeli, C.; Polici, M.; Del Gaudio, A.; Tremamunno, G.; Zerunian, M.; Laghi, A.; Caruso, D.. - In: LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA. - ISSN 1826-6983. - 130:8(2025), pp. 1149-1157. [10.1007/s11547-025-02019-6]
Accelerated deep learning-based function assessment in cardiovascular magnetic resonance
De Santis D.Primo
;Fanelli F.;Pugliese L.;Bona G. G.;Polidori T.;Santangeli C.;Polici M.;Del Gaudio A.;Tremamunno G.;Zerunian M.;Laghi A.
;Caruso D.
2025
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate diagnostic accuracy and image quality of deep learning (DL) cine sequences for LV and RV parameters compared to conventional balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) cine sequences in cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Material and methods From January to April 2024, patients with clinically indicated CMR were prospectively included. LV and RV were segmented from short-axis bSSFP and DL cine sequences. LV and RV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (EDV), stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction, and LV end-diastolic mass were calculated. The acquisition time of both sequences was registered. Results were compared with paired-samples t test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Agreement between DL cine and bSSFP was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. Image quality was graded by two readers based on blood-to-myocardium contrast, endocardial edge definition, and motion artifacts, using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = insufficient quality; 5 = excellent quality). Results Sixty-two patients were included (mean age: 47 +/- 17 years, 41 men). No significant differences between DL cine and bSSFP were found for all LV and RV parameters (P >= .176). DL cine was significantly faster (1.35 +/- .55 m vs 2.83 +/- .79 m; P < .001). The agreement between DL cine and bSSFP was strong, with bias ranging from 45 to 1.75% for LV and from - 0.38 to 2.43% for RV. Among LV parameters, the highest agreement was obtained for ESV and SV, which fell within the acceptable limit of agreement (LOA) in 84% of cases. EDV obtained the highest agreement among RV parameters, falling within the acceptable LOA in 90% of cases. Overall image quality was comparable (median: 5, IQR: 4-5; P = .330), while endocardial edge definition of DL cine (median: 4, IQR: 4-5) was lower than bSSFP (median: 5, IQR: 4-5; P = .002). Conclusion DL cine allows fast and accurate quantification of LV and RV parameters and comparable image quality with conventional bSSFP.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
