Peritoneal malignancies (PM) are defined as the spread of malignant epithelial cells in the peritoneal cavity. Until the recent past, the prognosis was considered extremely poor, and the treatment options had only palliative intent. Currently, new locoregional treatments have radically changed the outcome. CT is pivotal in PM diagnosis, staging, surgical planning, and determining therapeutic decisions. MRI should be evaluated in a preoperative setting for the evaluation of mesentery, serosal, and in any cases of contraindication of CT with contrast medium, while in the restaging clinical setting, it does not have a defined role. In the preoperative clinical setting, imaging could provide the surgeon with specific information concerning disease burden by showing the invasion of vital anatomic structures, and it is therefore essential to describe the feasibility of the surgery. However, recognizing the imaging findings of peritoneal deposits depends mainly on the histology of the primary tumor and the peritoneal spaces, thus rendering knowledge of peritoneal anatomy essential. In addition, some benign pathologies show similar imaging features that overlap with PM, making differential diagnosis difficult. It is still unclear which of the two methods, CT and MRI, is superior in terms of performance, and literature data are often controversial. Thus, the purpose of this review is to provide some practical tips for CT and MRI protocols and imaging findings essential to detect and characterize peritoneal deposits in each anatomical space, and to provide an overview of the main differential diagnosis with other peritoneal conditions.Critical relevance statement Peritoneal malignancies should be understood as a heterogeneous pattern of diseases, with variable prognosis and treatment options. CT remains the main imaging method; MRI finds application for involvement of the serosa and mesentery and when contrast-enhanced CT is not feasible.

CT and MR in peritoneal malignancies: pearls and pitfalls at preoperative examination / Polici, M.; Palmeri, F.; Golia, E.; Parri, E.; Gentiloni Silveri, G.; Puglisi, F.; De Santis, D.; Zerunian, M.; Pucciarelli, F.; Polidori, T.; Ciolina, M.; Sammartino, P.; Laghi, A.; Caruso, D.. - In: INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING. - ISSN 1869-4101. - 16:1(2025). [10.1186/s13244-025-02060-z]

CT and MR in peritoneal malignancies: pearls and pitfalls at preoperative examination

Polici M.
Primo
;
Palmeri F.;Golia E.;Parri E.;Gentiloni Silveri G.;Puglisi F.;De Santis D.;Zerunian M.;Pucciarelli F.;Polidori T.;Ciolina M.;Sammartino P.;Caruso D.
2025

Abstract

Peritoneal malignancies (PM) are defined as the spread of malignant epithelial cells in the peritoneal cavity. Until the recent past, the prognosis was considered extremely poor, and the treatment options had only palliative intent. Currently, new locoregional treatments have radically changed the outcome. CT is pivotal in PM diagnosis, staging, surgical planning, and determining therapeutic decisions. MRI should be evaluated in a preoperative setting for the evaluation of mesentery, serosal, and in any cases of contraindication of CT with contrast medium, while in the restaging clinical setting, it does not have a defined role. In the preoperative clinical setting, imaging could provide the surgeon with specific information concerning disease burden by showing the invasion of vital anatomic structures, and it is therefore essential to describe the feasibility of the surgery. However, recognizing the imaging findings of peritoneal deposits depends mainly on the histology of the primary tumor and the peritoneal spaces, thus rendering knowledge of peritoneal anatomy essential. In addition, some benign pathologies show similar imaging features that overlap with PM, making differential diagnosis difficult. It is still unclear which of the two methods, CT and MRI, is superior in terms of performance, and literature data are often controversial. Thus, the purpose of this review is to provide some practical tips for CT and MRI protocols and imaging findings essential to detect and characterize peritoneal deposits in each anatomical space, and to provide an overview of the main differential diagnosis with other peritoneal conditions.Critical relevance statement Peritoneal malignancies should be understood as a heterogeneous pattern of diseases, with variable prognosis and treatment options. CT remains the main imaging method; MRI finds application for involvement of the serosa and mesentery and when contrast-enhanced CT is not feasible.
2025
Peritoneum; Radiology; General surgery; CT; MRI
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01g Articolo di rassegna (Review)
CT and MR in peritoneal malignancies: pearls and pitfalls at preoperative examination / Polici, M.; Palmeri, F.; Golia, E.; Parri, E.; Gentiloni Silveri, G.; Puglisi, F.; De Santis, D.; Zerunian, M.; Pucciarelli, F.; Polidori, T.; Ciolina, M.; Sammartino, P.; Laghi, A.; Caruso, D.. - In: INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING. - ISSN 1869-4101. - 16:1(2025). [10.1186/s13244-025-02060-z]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
s13244-025-02060-z.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: Polici_CT and MR_2025
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 4.05 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.05 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1747266
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact