In an era of digital fragmentation and contested expertise, mediated public trust is under pressure. This study examines how journalists in Germany, Italy, and Lithuania perceive their role amid structural media shifts, politicized environments, and the rise of alternative sources. Drawing on 14 focus group discussions and 8 narrative interviews, we explore how national media systems and professional cultures shape journalistic strategies. Rather than a uniform erosion of trust, journalists report polarization shaped by ideology, platform dynamics, and shifting audience expectations. Many strive to act as trust brokers but face constraints from precarious working conditions, editorial pressures, and fragmented publics. We argue that trust in science journalism depends not only on journalistic practice but on broader systemic conditions, including institutional support, media infrastructures, and audience trust cultures (i.e., prevailing trust norms among different publics). This cross-national comparison advances a more differentiated understanding of how trust is negotiated in contemporary science communication.

Science journalists and public trust: comparative insights from Germany, Italy, and Lithuania / Mahr, Dana; Bussoletti, Arianna; Coenen, Christopher; Comunello, Francesca; Baniukevič, Julija; Weinberger, Nora. - In: JCOM: JOURNAL OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS. - ISSN 1824-2049. - 24:5(2025). [10.22323/149220250818111637]

Science journalists and public trust: comparative insights from Germany, Italy, and Lithuania

Arianna Bussoletti;Francesca Comunello;
2025

Abstract

In an era of digital fragmentation and contested expertise, mediated public trust is under pressure. This study examines how journalists in Germany, Italy, and Lithuania perceive their role amid structural media shifts, politicized environments, and the rise of alternative sources. Drawing on 14 focus group discussions and 8 narrative interviews, we explore how national media systems and professional cultures shape journalistic strategies. Rather than a uniform erosion of trust, journalists report polarization shaped by ideology, platform dynamics, and shifting audience expectations. Many strive to act as trust brokers but face constraints from precarious working conditions, editorial pressures, and fragmented publics. We argue that trust in science journalism depends not only on journalistic practice but on broader systemic conditions, including institutional support, media infrastructures, and audience trust cultures (i.e., prevailing trust norms among different publics). This cross-national comparison advances a more differentiated understanding of how trust is negotiated in contemporary science communication.
2025
Trust in science; Science journalism; Science communication; Public perception of science and technology; Qualitative research; Media systems; Misinformation
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Science journalists and public trust: comparative insights from Germany, Italy, and Lithuania / Mahr, Dana; Bussoletti, Arianna; Coenen, Christopher; Comunello, Francesca; Baniukevič, Julija; Weinberger, Nora. - In: JCOM: JOURNAL OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS. - ISSN 1824-2049. - 24:5(2025). [10.22323/149220250818111637]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1747119
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact