The purpose of this article is to compare the alginate impression with digital impression using the introral scanner Carestream 3600 and understand which is preferred by patients. 50 young orthodontic patients (25 boys and 25 girls) who had no previous experience of impressions were enrolled in the study. After the impressions the patients were subjected to a questionnaire for both types of impressions. They were asked about feelings of nausea and breathing issues related to whether a digital or alginate impression was taken. As for the feeling of nausea, 24 girls and 22 boys did not have this feeling with digital impressions; as regards breathing, 19 girls and 23 boys did not find respiratory problems with the intraoral scanner. At the end, patients were asked which method they preferred. About 75% both for girls and boys preferred the intraoral scanner. Therefore, the digital method was found to be the most comfortable for the patients.
Traditional versus digital impression: compliance and preference in pediatric patients- review / Luzzi, V; Di Carlo, G; Crupi, E; Quarta, E; De Angelis, F; Di Carlo, S; Polimeni, A; Ierardo, G. - In: ANNALI DI STOMATOLOGIA. - ISSN 1971-1441. - 13:1-4(2022), pp. 3-8. [10.59987/ads/2022.1-4.3-8]
Traditional versus digital impression: compliance and preference in pediatric patients- review
Luzzi, VPrimo
;Di Carlo, GSecondo
;Crupi, E;Quarta, E;De Angelis, F
;Di Carlo, S;Polimeni, APenultimo
;Ierardo, GUltimo
2022
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to compare the alginate impression with digital impression using the introral scanner Carestream 3600 and understand which is preferred by patients. 50 young orthodontic patients (25 boys and 25 girls) who had no previous experience of impressions were enrolled in the study. After the impressions the patients were subjected to a questionnaire for both types of impressions. They were asked about feelings of nausea and breathing issues related to whether a digital or alginate impression was taken. As for the feeling of nausea, 24 girls and 22 boys did not have this feeling with digital impressions; as regards breathing, 19 girls and 23 boys did not find respiratory problems with the intraoral scanner. At the end, patients were asked which method they preferred. About 75% both for girls and boys preferred the intraoral scanner. Therefore, the digital method was found to be the most comfortable for the patients.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Luzzi_Traditional-versus-digital_2022.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
346.9 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
346.9 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


