Objective: The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of extranodal extension (ENE) on survival outcomes for patients with metastatic cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (cHNSCC). Methods: The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to define the impact of ENE on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: A total of 2076 patients (males: 84.4%) with a median age of 73.3 years were included. The incidence of ENE was 65.6% (N = 1299/1979). The median follow-up time was 38.4 months (95% CI: 21–38.4). The estimated pooled HRs were 1.31 (95% CI: 0.72–2.39; p = 0.28) and 1.80 (95% CI: 0.53–6.10; p = 0.22) for OS and DFS, respectively. Conclusions: ENE may not be a reliable prognostic factor in metastatic cHNSCC. Further prospective studies are needed to refine risk stratification and improve the current nodal classification system.
Impact of extranodal extension in metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a systematic review and meta‐analysis / Costantino, Andrea; Marco Pace, Gian; Zimello, Camilla; Russo, Elena; Greco, Antonio; Polimeni, Antonella; Scott Magnuson, J.; De Virgilio, Armando. - In: HEAD & NECK. - ISSN 1097-0347. - (2025). [10.1002/hed.28251]
Impact of extranodal extension in metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Elena Russo;Antonio Greco;Antonella Polimeni;Armando De Virgilio
2025
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of extranodal extension (ENE) on survival outcomes for patients with metastatic cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (cHNSCC). Methods: The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to define the impact of ENE on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: A total of 2076 patients (males: 84.4%) with a median age of 73.3 years were included. The incidence of ENE was 65.6% (N = 1299/1979). The median follow-up time was 38.4 months (95% CI: 21–38.4). The estimated pooled HRs were 1.31 (95% CI: 0.72–2.39; p = 0.28) and 1.80 (95% CI: 0.53–6.10; p = 0.22) for OS and DFS, respectively. Conclusions: ENE may not be a reliable prognostic factor in metastatic cHNSCC. Further prospective studies are needed to refine risk stratification and improve the current nodal classification system.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Costantino_Impact-of-Extranodal_2025.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
1.58 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.58 MB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


