Flexible work arrangements have the potential to enhance work–life balance and contribute to more sustainable work environments. However, they may also increase fatigue and lead to greater work–life conflict (WLC). This study offers a novel contribution by examining the relationship between flexible work arrangements—focusing in particular on the cognitive demands of flexible work (CDFW), which encompass the task structuring, scheduling of working times, planning of working place, and coordination with others—and WLC. Specifically, the study investigates the mediating role of workload in this relationship. Furthermore, it also explores whether perceived organizational support (POS) moderates the indirect relationships between CDFW and WLC, within the framework of the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model. Data were collected from a sample of 419 employees in the Italian public sector. The study also controls for potential confounding variables, such as age, gender, duration of employment in public administration, and weekly working hours, to account for their influence on work–life balance and workload. The results highlight a significant positive relationship between planning of the working place and WLC. Additionally, workload plays a mediating role between CDFW subdimensions and WLC. However, POS does not moderate the mediated relationship between CDFW and WLC.

Sustainable work–life balance, social support, and workload: exploring the potential dual role of flexible work in a moderated mediation model / Bellini, Diego; Barbieri, Barbara; Mondo, Marina; De Simone, Silvia; Marocco, Silvia. - In: SUSTAINABILITY. - ISSN 2071-1050. - 17:15(2025). [10.3390/su17157067]

Sustainable work–life balance, social support, and workload: exploring the potential dual role of flexible work in a moderated mediation model

Marocco, Silvia
Ultimo
2025

Abstract

Flexible work arrangements have the potential to enhance work–life balance and contribute to more sustainable work environments. However, they may also increase fatigue and lead to greater work–life conflict (WLC). This study offers a novel contribution by examining the relationship between flexible work arrangements—focusing in particular on the cognitive demands of flexible work (CDFW), which encompass the task structuring, scheduling of working times, planning of working place, and coordination with others—and WLC. Specifically, the study investigates the mediating role of workload in this relationship. Furthermore, it also explores whether perceived organizational support (POS) moderates the indirect relationships between CDFW and WLC, within the framework of the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model. Data were collected from a sample of 419 employees in the Italian public sector. The study also controls for potential confounding variables, such as age, gender, duration of employment in public administration, and weekly working hours, to account for their influence on work–life balance and workload. The results highlight a significant positive relationship between planning of the working place and WLC. Additionally, workload plays a mediating role between CDFW subdimensions and WLC. However, POS does not moderate the mediated relationship between CDFW and WLC.
2025
work–life balance; work–life conflict; challenging demands; flexible work; organizational support
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Sustainable work–life balance, social support, and workload: exploring the potential dual role of flexible work in a moderated mediation model / Bellini, Diego; Barbieri, Barbara; Mondo, Marina; De Simone, Silvia; Marocco, Silvia. - In: SUSTAINABILITY. - ISSN 2071-1050. - 17:15(2025). [10.3390/su17157067]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Bellini_Sustainable_work–llife_balance_2025.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: articolo
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 610.33 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
610.33 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1744140
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact