In this letter, written in response to the article by Ninotta et al. on CorneaMax/CorneaJet versus Tissue-C/Carry-C for corneal organ culture, methodological concerns are raised regarding medium renewal, omission of the CornealFloat device, and non-adherence to validated temperature protocols during early organ culture—factors that may have influenced endothelial viability and limit the interpretability of the findings.
Letter regarding: comparison of two commercial media for corneal organ culture and deswelling: corneamax/corneajet versus tissue-c/carry-c / Lucchino, Luca; Visioli, Giacomo; Pocobelli, Augusto. - In: CORNEA. - ISSN 0277-3740. - (2025), pp. 1-1. [10.1097/ico.0000000000003947]
Letter regarding: comparison of two commercial media for corneal organ culture and deswelling: corneamax/corneajet versus tissue-c/carry-c
Lucchino, LucaPrimo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;Visioli, Giacomo
Secondo
Writing – Review & Editing
;
2025
Abstract
In this letter, written in response to the article by Ninotta et al. on CorneaMax/CorneaJet versus Tissue-C/Carry-C for corneal organ culture, methodological concerns are raised regarding medium renewal, omission of the CornealFloat device, and non-adherence to validated temperature protocols during early organ culture—factors that may have influenced endothelial viability and limit the interpretability of the findings.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Lucchino_Letter regarding_2025.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
44.87 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
44.87 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
