The essay poses the question of the demythization of science starting from the confrontation between Castelli and Bultmann in the early 1960s at the start of the Roman Colloquia on Demythization. Bultmann argues that modern science has demythologized the facts narrated in the Bible and imposes a new interpretation of the meaning of the kerygma. Castelli opposes the idea of the connection between kerygma and historicity of the facts narrated and interprets demythization as a conditioning by science on the rhythms of life. It is on this latter aspect that future demythization must be realized. In the second part of the essay, the question of the demythization of science is posed from the phenomenon of science denialism: the existential dimension as an identity factor that conditions the acceptance of scientific truths, conspiracy as a surrogate for lost narrative identities, and the recovery of trust as an antidote to denialism repropose elements of that confrontation.

Demitizzare la scienza? Un bilancio attuale del confronto tra Castelli e Bultmann sulla demitizzazione / Valenza, Pierluigi. - In: TEORIA. - ISSN 1122-1259. - 1:45(2025), pp. 71-87. [10.4454/1fjbkq41]

Demitizzare la scienza? Un bilancio attuale del confronto tra Castelli e Bultmann sulla demitizzazione

Valenza Pierluigi
2025

Abstract

The essay poses the question of the demythization of science starting from the confrontation between Castelli and Bultmann in the early 1960s at the start of the Roman Colloquia on Demythization. Bultmann argues that modern science has demythologized the facts narrated in the Bible and imposes a new interpretation of the meaning of the kerygma. Castelli opposes the idea of the connection between kerygma and historicity of the facts narrated and interprets demythization as a conditioning by science on the rhythms of life. It is on this latter aspect that future demythization must be realized. In the second part of the essay, the question of the demythization of science is posed from the phenomenon of science denialism: the existential dimension as an identity factor that conditions the acceptance of scientific truths, conspiracy as a surrogate for lost narrative identities, and the recovery of trust as an antidote to denialism repropose elements of that confrontation.
2025
demythization; Castelli; Bultmann; science and myth; science denialism
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Demitizzare la scienza? Un bilancio attuale del confronto tra Castelli e Bultmann sulla demitizzazione / Valenza, Pierluigi. - In: TEORIA. - ISSN 1122-1259. - 1:45(2025), pp. 71-87. [10.4454/1fjbkq41]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Valenza_Demitizzare-la-scienza_2025.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 199.21 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
199.21 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1743934
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact