What makes animal gaits so audibly rhythmic? To answer this question, we recorded the footfall sound of 19 horses and quantified the rhythmic differences in the temporal structure of three natural gaits: walk, trot, and canter. Our analyses show that each gait displays a strikingly specific rhythmic pattern and that all gaits are organized according to small-integer ratios, those found when adjacent temporal intervals are related by a mathematically simple relationship of integer numbers. Walk and trot exhibit an isochronous structure (1:1)—similar to a ticking clock—while canter is characterized by three small-integer ratios (1:1, 1:2, 2:1). While walk and trot both show isochrony, trot has a slower tempo and is more precise and accurate, like a metronome. Our results quantitatively discriminate horse gaits based on rhythm, revealing striking commonalities with human music and some animal communicative signals. Gait and vocal rhythmicity share key features, and the former likely predates the latter; we suggest this supports gait-based hypotheses for the evolution of rhythm. Specifically, the perception of locomotor rhythmicity may have evolved in different species under pressure for predator recognition and mate selection; it may have been later exapted for rhythmic vocal communication.

The rhythm of horse gaits / Laffi, Lia; Raimondi, Teresa; Ferrante, Carola; Pagliara, Eleonora; Bertuglia, Andrea; Briefer, Elodie Floriane; Gamba, Marco; Ravignani, Andrea. - In: ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES. - ISSN 0077-8923. - 1543:1(2025), pp. 86-93. [10.1111/nyas.15271]

The rhythm of horse gaits

Laffi, Lia
;
Raimondi, Teresa
Primo
;
Ravignani, Andrea
Ultimo
2025

Abstract

What makes animal gaits so audibly rhythmic? To answer this question, we recorded the footfall sound of 19 horses and quantified the rhythmic differences in the temporal structure of three natural gaits: walk, trot, and canter. Our analyses show that each gait displays a strikingly specific rhythmic pattern and that all gaits are organized according to small-integer ratios, those found when adjacent temporal intervals are related by a mathematically simple relationship of integer numbers. Walk and trot exhibit an isochronous structure (1:1)—similar to a ticking clock—while canter is characterized by three small-integer ratios (1:1, 1:2, 2:1). While walk and trot both show isochrony, trot has a slower tempo and is more precise and accurate, like a metronome. Our results quantitatively discriminate horse gaits based on rhythm, revealing striking commonalities with human music and some animal communicative signals. Gait and vocal rhythmicity share key features, and the former likely predates the latter; we suggest this supports gait-based hypotheses for the evolution of rhythm. Specifically, the perception of locomotor rhythmicity may have evolved in different species under pressure for predator recognition and mate selection; it may have been later exapted for rhythmic vocal communication.
2025
Evolution of rhythm; isochrony; locomotion; mammals; rhythmic categories
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
The rhythm of horse gaits / Laffi, Lia; Raimondi, Teresa; Ferrante, Carola; Pagliara, Eleonora; Bertuglia, Andrea; Briefer, Elodie Floriane; Gamba, Marco; Ravignani, Andrea. - In: ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES. - ISSN 0077-8923. - 1543:1(2025), pp. 86-93. [10.1111/nyas.15271]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Ann NY Acad Sci - 2024 - Laffi - The rhythm of horse gaits.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: Laffi_The rhythm_2025
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 958.76 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
958.76 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1743712
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact