This article presents an empirical analysis aimed at examining the impact of dangerousness indicators in the investigative activities conducted by the probation office of the Varese Court when evaluating applications for home detention. Through the examination of orders issued in 2022, the study explores the effect of dangerousness indicators on the assessment of requests for this alternative measure, categorizing and analyzing the issued measures along with the underlying rationales. The findings highlight that, despite the introduction of criminological criteria aimed at making prognostic judgments more objective and standardized, the probation office occasionally relied on discretionary factors within the examined sample. This analysis contributes to a deeper understanding of the complexities involved in applying legal principles related to social dangerousness and home detention, with significant implications for policies and practices within the criminal justice system.
Evaluating social dangerousness for granting home detention: an empirical analysis of orders from the Varese Court in 2022 / Flutti, E.; Moretti, G.; Caruso, P.; Russo, C.; Scibilia, A.; Travaini, G.. - In: RASSEGNA ITALIANA DI CRIMINOLOGIA. - ISSN 2240-8053. - 19:1(2025), pp. 31-36. [10.7347/RIC-012025-p031]
Evaluating social dangerousness for granting home detention: an empirical analysis of orders from the Varese Court in 2022
Flutti E.
;
2025
Abstract
This article presents an empirical analysis aimed at examining the impact of dangerousness indicators in the investigative activities conducted by the probation office of the Varese Court when evaluating applications for home detention. Through the examination of orders issued in 2022, the study explores the effect of dangerousness indicators on the assessment of requests for this alternative measure, categorizing and analyzing the issued measures along with the underlying rationales. The findings highlight that, despite the introduction of criminological criteria aimed at making prognostic judgments more objective and standardized, the probation office occasionally relied on discretionary factors within the examined sample. This analysis contributes to a deeper understanding of the complexities involved in applying legal principles related to social dangerousness and home detention, with significant implications for policies and practices within the criminal justice system.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
031-036+•+Flutti+et+al.pdf
accesso aperto
Note: Flutti_Evaluating_2025
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
11.54 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
11.54 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


