Flow cytometry based immunophenotyping provides prime insight into cellular population composition and characteristics, and is widely used in basic and clinical research. Challenges in processing peripheral blood samples in a timely manner necessitate protocol adaptations and utilization of fixatives. Fixation, however, may introduce artifacts to the flow cytometry readout. We performed a comparative flow cytometry immunophenotyping analysis of 13 immune cell populations in the whole blood using a staining protocol with and without fixation step. Freshly procured human peripheral blood samples were stained with a panel of 33 fluorochrome- conjugated antibodies. Samples were processed using a protocol with or without a paraformaldehyde-based fixation step, and matching sample pairs were analyzed by flow cytometry. Our results show that paraformaldehyde-based fixation, in comparison to matched unfixed samples, did not significantly affect population distribution and frequency for: B cells, Plasmablasts, Dendritic cells, NK cells, Granulocytes, Neutrophils, Eosinophils, or Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells. However, fixation led to significant marker shifts in the subpopulation distribution in CD4, T regulatory, CD8, Monocytes, and Basophils. These results indicate the importance of pre-experimental assessment of fixation-introduced artifacts in the flow cytometry output when considering the feasibility of fresh processing. This is especially important for samples analyzed using comprehensive exploratory immunoprofiling panels.

Comparative flow cytometry-based immunophenotyping analysis of peripheral blood leukocytes before and after fixation with paraformaldehyde / Vistica Sampino, E., Morgan, J., Chorzalska, A., Nguyen, L., Yu, C., Rodriguez, A., Pardo, M., Bonal, D., Liang, O., Kim, M., De Vito, R., Lulla, R.r., Dubielecka, P.m.. - In: JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS. - ISSN 0022-1759. - (2022). [10.1016/j.jim.2022.113379]

Comparative flow cytometry-based immunophenotyping analysis of peripheral blood leukocytes before and after fixation with paraformaldehyde

De Vito R;
2022

Abstract

Flow cytometry based immunophenotyping provides prime insight into cellular population composition and characteristics, and is widely used in basic and clinical research. Challenges in processing peripheral blood samples in a timely manner necessitate protocol adaptations and utilization of fixatives. Fixation, however, may introduce artifacts to the flow cytometry readout. We performed a comparative flow cytometry immunophenotyping analysis of 13 immune cell populations in the whole blood using a staining protocol with and without fixation step. Freshly procured human peripheral blood samples were stained with a panel of 33 fluorochrome- conjugated antibodies. Samples were processed using a protocol with or without a paraformaldehyde-based fixation step, and matching sample pairs were analyzed by flow cytometry. Our results show that paraformaldehyde-based fixation, in comparison to matched unfixed samples, did not significantly affect population distribution and frequency for: B cells, Plasmablasts, Dendritic cells, NK cells, Granulocytes, Neutrophils, Eosinophils, or Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells. However, fixation led to significant marker shifts in the subpopulation distribution in CD4, T regulatory, CD8, Monocytes, and Basophils. These results indicate the importance of pre-experimental assessment of fixation-introduced artifacts in the flow cytometry output when considering the feasibility of fresh processing. This is especially important for samples analyzed using comprehensive exploratory immunoprofiling panels.
2022
Flow cytometry Immunophenotyping Gating Sample fixation CD8 CD4 T regulatory cells B cells Transitional B cells Plasmablasts NK cells Monocytes Dendritic cells Granulocytes Neutrophils Basophils Eosinophils Stem cells and progenitors
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Comparative flow cytometry-based immunophenotyping analysis of peripheral blood leukocytes before and after fixation with paraformaldehyde / Vistica Sampino, E., Morgan, J., Chorzalska, A., Nguyen, L., Yu, C., Rodriguez, A., Pardo, M., Bonal, D., Liang, O., Kim, M., De Vito, R., Lulla, R.r., Dubielecka, P.m.. - In: JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS. - ISSN 0022-1759. - (2022). [10.1016/j.jim.2022.113379]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1741942
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact