Since the first intra-articular ACL reconstruction was performed in our institution by Giancarlo Puddu in November 1979, the semitendinosus has always been our graft of choice as an ACL substitute. This choice which remained unchanged even when, in the nineties and early twenty-first century, the bone patellar tendon was considered the “gold standard” in ACL reconstruction, was mainly due to biological, mechanical, clinical and surgical factors, which included the following: the suitability of the hamstrings for the intra-articular synovial environment; their excellent regeneration potential; their biomechanical properties comparing well with those of the Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone (BPTB) and native ACL; their low morbidity from harvesting; their suitability for use along with extra-articular reconstructions; and easier rehabilitation. Moreover, in most long-term follow-ups, the use of the semitendinosus results in a lower rate of degenerative osteoarthrosis than the use of the BPTB. The use of specific fixation devices could lead to reliable early mechanical fixation, also promoting definitive biological fixation through Sharpey fibres.

Why the Semitendinosus? / Ferretti, A.; Labianca, L.; Papandrea, P.. - (2022), pp. 101-115. [10.1007/978-3-031-00115-4_9]

Why the Semitendinosus?

Ferretti A.
Supervision
;
Labianca L.
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
2022

Abstract

Since the first intra-articular ACL reconstruction was performed in our institution by Giancarlo Puddu in November 1979, the semitendinosus has always been our graft of choice as an ACL substitute. This choice which remained unchanged even when, in the nineties and early twenty-first century, the bone patellar tendon was considered the “gold standard” in ACL reconstruction, was mainly due to biological, mechanical, clinical and surgical factors, which included the following: the suitability of the hamstrings for the intra-articular synovial environment; their excellent regeneration potential; their biomechanical properties comparing well with those of the Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone (BPTB) and native ACL; their low morbidity from harvesting; their suitability for use along with extra-articular reconstructions; and easier rehabilitation. Moreover, in most long-term follow-ups, the use of the semitendinosus results in a lower rate of degenerative osteoarthrosis than the use of the BPTB. The use of specific fixation devices could lead to reliable early mechanical fixation, also promoting definitive biological fixation through Sharpey fibres.
2022
ACL; Hamstrings; Patellar tendon; Semitendinosus
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Why the Semitendinosus? / Ferretti, A.; Labianca, L.; Papandrea, P.. - (2022), pp. 101-115. [10.1007/978-3-031-00115-4_9]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1741174
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact