The idea of demythologization seems obsolete today. Contrary to what seems to be an established fact, in this paper I aim to argue that what Bultmann called Entmythologisierung continues to point to a fruitful theoretical project. However, this implies two further theses: a) the possibility of fully valorizing demythologization as a conceptual resource requires that it be solidly situated on the Heideggerian ground from which, in a more or less direct way, it comes; b) the way Heidegger understands the relationship between philosophy and theology, centered on the idea of Korrektion, must itself be 'corrected' in some of its fundamental points.
Radici heideggeriane e potenziale teorico della demitizzazione. Una proposta di ‘correzione’ / Bancalari, Stefano. - In: TEORIA. - ISSN 1122-1259. - (2025), pp. 101-115.
Radici heideggeriane e potenziale teorico della demitizzazione. Una proposta di ‘correzione’
Stefano Bancalari
2025
Abstract
The idea of demythologization seems obsolete today. Contrary to what seems to be an established fact, in this paper I aim to argue that what Bultmann called Entmythologisierung continues to point to a fruitful theoretical project. However, this implies two further theses: a) the possibility of fully valorizing demythologization as a conceptual resource requires that it be solidly situated on the Heideggerian ground from which, in a more or less direct way, it comes; b) the way Heidegger understands the relationship between philosophy and theology, centered on the idea of Korrektion, must itself be 'corrected' in some of its fundamental points.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Bancalari_Radici-heideggeriane_2025.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
374.57 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
374.57 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


