Background: The relationship between dissociation features, maladaptive regulation strategies, and emotional dysregulation is a controversial issue. This meta-analytic review provides a comprehensive and multidimensional overview of the association between aspects of dissociation and emotional (dys)regulation. Methods: We conducted systematic research on the main databases (Psycinfo, PsycARTICLES, Pubmed, MEDLINE, Scopus), collecting the literature of the last 20 years. A total of 120 studies were included in the meta-analytic review. The analyses were based on the Pearson coefficient as a measure of the size of the effect, using the random effect model and performing moderation analysis. Results: Results showed significant relationships between emotion (dys)regulation and the different facets of dissociation. Overall, we observed stronger associations between deficits in emotion regulation/maladaptive regulating strategies, rather than alexithymia, and dissociation, supporting the prior involvement of emotional dimensions in dissociative experiences. Conclusions: This work confirms the connection between emotion (dys)regulation and dissociation, revealing differential patterns according to the specific assessed dimensions and, thus, providing a systematization of the associations between specific aspects of the examined constructs.

Unravelling the associations between dissociation and emotion (Dys)regulation: a multidimensional meta-analytic review / Bruno, S.; Tacchino, C.; Anconetani, G.; Velotti, P. - In: JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS. - ISSN 0165-0327. - 380(2025), pp. 808-824. [10.1016/j.jad.2025.03.158]

Unravelling the associations between dissociation and emotion (Dys)regulation: a multidimensional meta-analytic review

Bruno, S.
Primo
;
Tacchino, C.
Secondo
;
Anconetani, G.;Velotti, P
Ultimo
2025

Abstract

Background: The relationship between dissociation features, maladaptive regulation strategies, and emotional dysregulation is a controversial issue. This meta-analytic review provides a comprehensive and multidimensional overview of the association between aspects of dissociation and emotional (dys)regulation. Methods: We conducted systematic research on the main databases (Psycinfo, PsycARTICLES, Pubmed, MEDLINE, Scopus), collecting the literature of the last 20 years. A total of 120 studies were included in the meta-analytic review. The analyses were based on the Pearson coefficient as a measure of the size of the effect, using the random effect model and performing moderation analysis. Results: Results showed significant relationships between emotion (dys)regulation and the different facets of dissociation. Overall, we observed stronger associations between deficits in emotion regulation/maladaptive regulating strategies, rather than alexithymia, and dissociation, supporting the prior involvement of emotional dimensions in dissociative experiences. Conclusions: This work confirms the connection between emotion (dys)regulation and dissociation, revealing differential patterns according to the specific assessed dimensions and, thus, providing a systematization of the associations between specific aspects of the examined constructs.
2025
dissociation; emotion regulation; alexithymia; detachment; compartmentalization; metanalysis
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Unravelling the associations between dissociation and emotion (Dys)regulation: a multidimensional meta-analytic review / Bruno, S.; Tacchino, C.; Anconetani, G.; Velotti, P. - In: JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS. - ISSN 0165-0327. - 380(2025), pp. 808-824. [10.1016/j.jad.2025.03.158]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Bruno_Unravelling_associations_between_2025.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 4.96 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.96 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1739565
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact