: This paper presents a novel method for measuring organizational resilience by integrating the Rasch model into the Resilience Analysis Grid (RAG), providing a robust and objective tool for cross-sectional resilience studies. By treating the four cornerstones of resilience as abilities, Rasch’s model allows for an assessment that positions both the difficulty of the items and the organizations’ ability along a common scale. The requirement is the availability of a number of different organizations to be assessed. We employ a dataset generated through an artificial simulation and analyzed in a controlled environment, demonstrating the potential of Rasch-based resilience assessments to provide accurate, comparable, and scalable results in different organizational contexts. The traditional RAG is designed without a normative reference group, which makes it challenging to evaluate its results. The proposed model overcomes this limitation by offering a measurement scale on which different organizations can be placed without the need to use a normative group, facilitating the more consistent and timely monitoring of systems. This novel approach to quantifying resilience potentials highlights the transformative role of digital technologies in improving workplace safety and resilience. It advances resilience engineering and occupational health and safety practices in complex environments like manufacturing and industrial sectors.

Resilience Analysis Grid–Rasch rating scale model for measuring organizational resilience potential / Falegnami, Andrea; Tomassi, Andrea; Corbelli, Giuseppe; Romano, Elpidio. - In: APPLIED SCIENCES. - ISSN 2076-3417. - 15:4(2025), pp. 1-31. [10.3390/app15041695]

Resilience Analysis Grid–Rasch rating scale model for measuring organizational resilience potential

Falegnami, Andrea
;
Tomassi, Andrea;Corbelli, Giuseppe;
2025

Abstract

: This paper presents a novel method for measuring organizational resilience by integrating the Rasch model into the Resilience Analysis Grid (RAG), providing a robust and objective tool for cross-sectional resilience studies. By treating the four cornerstones of resilience as abilities, Rasch’s model allows for an assessment that positions both the difficulty of the items and the organizations’ ability along a common scale. The requirement is the availability of a number of different organizations to be assessed. We employ a dataset generated through an artificial simulation and analyzed in a controlled environment, demonstrating the potential of Rasch-based resilience assessments to provide accurate, comparable, and scalable results in different organizational contexts. The traditional RAG is designed without a normative reference group, which makes it challenging to evaluate its results. The proposed model overcomes this limitation by offering a measurement scale on which different organizations can be placed without the need to use a normative group, facilitating the more consistent and timely monitoring of systems. This novel approach to quantifying resilience potentials highlights the transformative role of digital technologies in improving workplace safety and resilience. It advances resilience engineering and occupational health and safety practices in complex environments like manufacturing and industrial sectors.
2025
resilience engineering; Safety-II; synthetic data; Resilience Analysis Grid; sociotechnical system; simplexity; complixity
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Resilience Analysis Grid–Rasch rating scale model for measuring organizational resilience potential / Falegnami, Andrea; Tomassi, Andrea; Corbelli, Giuseppe; Romano, Elpidio. - In: APPLIED SCIENCES. - ISSN 2076-3417. - 15:4(2025), pp. 1-31. [10.3390/app15041695]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Falegnami_Resilience_2025.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 4.47 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.47 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1735558
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact