Introduction: Teledermatology, a branch of telemedicine, leverages communication technologies to deliver dermatological services remotely. In the Italian military context, this service is initiated by a medical officer stationed abroad in a remote location, who transmits photos and medical history data to a dermatologist at the "Celio" Military Hospital in Rome. Objective: To evaluate the impact of standardized versus freeform methods for collecting clinical and medical history data on diagnostic confidence and accuracy. Materials and Methods: An open-label, two-arm interventional study was conducted. The measured variables included: 1) initial diagnostic confidence expressed by the dermatologist based on the data initially received; 2) the number of additional communications exchanged between the deployed physicians and consultants to obtain missing information necessary for diagnosis; 3) the number of further evaluations following the first teleconsultation; 4) the ranking of the final diagnosis, obtained after various requests for further information and tests, compared to the top ten results of DermExpert™ by VisualDx®, using the most significant macroscopic image and the initial medical history data. Statistical analysis was performed using the two-sample t-test, Poisson test, and Mood’s test, with calculations carried out using Minitab® 21.4 software. The significance threshold for the p-value was set at <0.05. Results: 42 patients were enrolled in the control arm and 30 in the experimental arm. The experimental group showed greater diagnostic confidence (8.17/10.00 vs. 5.12/10.00), fewer additional communications (0.23 vs. 1.89 per patient), fewer subsequent evaluations (0.40 vs. 1.21 per patient), and a better ranking for the final diagnosis (2.50/10.00 vs. 6.00/10.00). Conclusion: These statistically significant results, even with the Bonferroni correction applied, indicate that standardized procedures in military teledermatology significantly enhance diagnostic confidence and accuracy compared to freeform methods.
Protocollo standardizzato di Teledermatologia «Store and Forward»: confidenza ed accuratezza diagnostica in ambito militare / Laghi, Alessandro. - (2025 Jan 29).
Protocollo standardizzato di Teledermatologia «Store and Forward»: confidenza ed accuratezza diagnostica in ambito militare
LAGHI, ALESSANDRO
29/01/2025
Abstract
Introduction: Teledermatology, a branch of telemedicine, leverages communication technologies to deliver dermatological services remotely. In the Italian military context, this service is initiated by a medical officer stationed abroad in a remote location, who transmits photos and medical history data to a dermatologist at the "Celio" Military Hospital in Rome. Objective: To evaluate the impact of standardized versus freeform methods for collecting clinical and medical history data on diagnostic confidence and accuracy. Materials and Methods: An open-label, two-arm interventional study was conducted. The measured variables included: 1) initial diagnostic confidence expressed by the dermatologist based on the data initially received; 2) the number of additional communications exchanged between the deployed physicians and consultants to obtain missing information necessary for diagnosis; 3) the number of further evaluations following the first teleconsultation; 4) the ranking of the final diagnosis, obtained after various requests for further information and tests, compared to the top ten results of DermExpert™ by VisualDx®, using the most significant macroscopic image and the initial medical history data. Statistical analysis was performed using the two-sample t-test, Poisson test, and Mood’s test, with calculations carried out using Minitab® 21.4 software. The significance threshold for the p-value was set at <0.05. Results: 42 patients were enrolled in the control arm and 30 in the experimental arm. The experimental group showed greater diagnostic confidence (8.17/10.00 vs. 5.12/10.00), fewer additional communications (0.23 vs. 1.89 per patient), fewer subsequent evaluations (0.40 vs. 1.21 per patient), and a better ranking for the final diagnosis (2.50/10.00 vs. 6.00/10.00). Conclusion: These statistically significant results, even with the Bonferroni correction applied, indicate that standardized procedures in military teledermatology significantly enhance diagnostic confidence and accuracy compared to freeform methods.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


