In their commentary on our recently published paper about electroencephalographic responses induced by cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation (Fong et al., 2023), Gassmann and colleagues (Gassmann et al., 2023b) try to explain the differences between our results and their own previous work on the same topic. We agree with them that many of the differences arise from our use of a different magnetic stimulation coil. However, two unresolved questions remain. (1) Which method is most likely to achieve optimal activation of cerebellar output? (2) To what extent are the evoked cerebellar responses contaminated by concomitant sensory input? We highlight the role of careful experimental design and of combining electrophysiological and behavioural data to obtain reliable TMS-EEG data.

Reply to: "Reflecting the causes of variability of EEG responses elicited by cerebellar TMS" / Fong, Py; Spampinato, D; Michell, K; Mancuso, M; Brown, K; Ibáñez, J; Di Santo, A; Latorre, A; Bhatia, K; Rothwell, Jc; Rocchi, L. - In: NEUROIMAGE. - ISSN 1095-9572. - (2023). [10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120392]

Reply to: "Reflecting the causes of variability of EEG responses elicited by cerebellar TMS"

Spampinato D;Mancuso M;Di Santo A;Latorre A;Rocchi L
2023

Abstract

In their commentary on our recently published paper about electroencephalographic responses induced by cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation (Fong et al., 2023), Gassmann and colleagues (Gassmann et al., 2023b) try to explain the differences between our results and their own previous work on the same topic. We agree with them that many of the differences arise from our use of a different magnetic stimulation coil. However, two unresolved questions remain. (1) Which method is most likely to achieve optimal activation of cerebellar output? (2) To what extent are the evoked cerebellar responses contaminated by concomitant sensory input? We highlight the role of careful experimental design and of combining electrophysiological and behavioural data to obtain reliable TMS-EEG data.
2023
Cerebellar-brain inhibition (CBI); Cerebellum; Electroencephalography (EEG); TMS-EEG; Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01b Commento, Erratum, Replica e simili
Reply to: "Reflecting the causes of variability of EEG responses elicited by cerebellar TMS" / Fong, Py; Spampinato, D; Michell, K; Mancuso, M; Brown, K; Ibáñez, J; Di Santo, A; Latorre, A; Bhatia, K; Rothwell, Jc; Rocchi, L. - In: NEUROIMAGE. - ISSN 1095-9572. - (2023). [10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120392]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
aaa.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: Fong_Reply_2023
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 311.29 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
311.29 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1733090
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact