Rationale and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to explore intra-individual differences in pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) fat attenuation index (FAI) between photon-counting detector (PCD)- and energy-integrating detector (EID)-CT. Material and Methods: Patients were prospectively enrolled for a PCD-CT research scan within 30 days of EID-CT. Both acquisitions were reconstructed using a Qr36 kernel at 0.6 mm slice thickness (EID and PCD-down-sampled [DS]) and at 0.2 mm ultra-high resolution (UHR) for the PCD-CT. Iterative reconstruction was turned “off” (filter back projection used as alternative reconstruction method) or set to a recommended level in current literature. Coronary PCAT FAI was measured automatically using established thresholds of −190 to −30 HU at a set distance and radius. Statistical testing was performed using repeated-measures ANOVA and Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests (p significance was determined to be <0.003). Results: In total, 40 patients (mean age 68±8 years, 32 males [80%]) were included for analysis. Absolute FAI measurements differed significantly for all vessels between all reconstructions in the ANOVA comparison (all p<.001). The FAI decreased going from EID-CT to PCD-DS, to PCD-UHR with iterative reconstruction turned off (e.g. right coronary artery: EID-CT: −76.5±8.9 vs −80.9±7.0 vs −88.3±6.7 HU, respectively; p < 0.001). The mean FAI of datasets using iterative reconstruction did not demonstrate significant differences on multiple comparisons (e.g. left circumflex artery: EID: −65.7±8.5; PCD-DS: −66.0±7.4; PCD-UHR: −67.8±7.0 HU, respectively; p>0.06). Conclusion: Intra-individual absolute PCAT FAI measurements differ significantly between EID- and PCD-CT when controlling for reconstruction kernel and slice thickness. However, the use of iterative reconstruction minimizes most differences in FAI, enabling inter-scanner comparability.

Intra-individual differences in pericoronary fat attenuation index measurements between photon-counting and energy-integrating detector computed tomography / Tremamunno, Giuseppe; Vecsey-Nagy, Milan; Hagar, Muhammad Taha; Schoepf, U Joseph; O'Doherty, Jim; Luetkens, Julian A; Kuetting, Daniel; Isaak, Alexander; Varga-Szemes, Akos; Emrich, Tilman; Kravchenko, Dmitrij. - In: ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY. - ISSN 1076-6332. - 32:3(2025), pp. 1333-1343. [10.1016/j.acra.2024.11.055]

Intra-individual differences in pericoronary fat attenuation index measurements between photon-counting and energy-integrating detector computed tomography

Tremamunno, Giuseppe
Primo
;
2025

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives: The purpose of this study was to explore intra-individual differences in pericoronary adipose tissue (PCAT) fat attenuation index (FAI) between photon-counting detector (PCD)- and energy-integrating detector (EID)-CT. Material and Methods: Patients were prospectively enrolled for a PCD-CT research scan within 30 days of EID-CT. Both acquisitions were reconstructed using a Qr36 kernel at 0.6 mm slice thickness (EID and PCD-down-sampled [DS]) and at 0.2 mm ultra-high resolution (UHR) for the PCD-CT. Iterative reconstruction was turned “off” (filter back projection used as alternative reconstruction method) or set to a recommended level in current literature. Coronary PCAT FAI was measured automatically using established thresholds of −190 to −30 HU at a set distance and radius. Statistical testing was performed using repeated-measures ANOVA and Bonferroni's multiple comparison tests (p significance was determined to be <0.003). Results: In total, 40 patients (mean age 68±8 years, 32 males [80%]) were included for analysis. Absolute FAI measurements differed significantly for all vessels between all reconstructions in the ANOVA comparison (all p<.001). The FAI decreased going from EID-CT to PCD-DS, to PCD-UHR with iterative reconstruction turned off (e.g. right coronary artery: EID-CT: −76.5±8.9 vs −80.9±7.0 vs −88.3±6.7 HU, respectively; p < 0.001). The mean FAI of datasets using iterative reconstruction did not demonstrate significant differences on multiple comparisons (e.g. left circumflex artery: EID: −65.7±8.5; PCD-DS: −66.0±7.4; PCD-UHR: −67.8±7.0 HU, respectively; p>0.06). Conclusion: Intra-individual absolute PCAT FAI measurements differ significantly between EID- and PCD-CT when controlling for reconstruction kernel and slice thickness. However, the use of iterative reconstruction minimizes most differences in FAI, enabling inter-scanner comparability.
2025
energy-integrating detector ct; pericoronary adipose tissue; photon-counting detector ct
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Intra-individual differences in pericoronary fat attenuation index measurements between photon-counting and energy-integrating detector computed tomography / Tremamunno, Giuseppe; Vecsey-Nagy, Milan; Hagar, Muhammad Taha; Schoepf, U Joseph; O'Doherty, Jim; Luetkens, Julian A; Kuetting, Daniel; Isaak, Alexander; Varga-Szemes, Akos; Emrich, Tilman; Kravchenko, Dmitrij. - In: ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY. - ISSN 1076-6332. - 32:3(2025), pp. 1333-1343. [10.1016/j.acra.2024.11.055]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Tremamunno_Intra-individual_2025.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Note: Articolo in press
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 4.63 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.63 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1731489
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact