This paper analyzes the process of development of the automobile industries in Korea and Taiwan, focusing on their bureaucratic politics based on discursive coordination. Despite similar conditions in the early 1970s, the automobile industries in Korea and Taiwan led to divergent paths, focusing on exports of finished cars and parts, respectively. This study holds that this difference is not an automatic result of a given industrial structure, but it came from the divergence of the automobile industrial policies in the two countries. Korea aimed to establish internationally competitive national champions by vertically integrating domestic firms, while Taiwan targeted niche market and fostered strategic suppliers for multinational companies by integrating into their global production system. However, unlike previous state-centered studies that focus on the cohesiveness and power distribution within the state, this paper emphasizes that the differentiation of the automobile industrial policies of the two countries, which started with similar goals, is the result of efforts to justify their policies within the state as well as socially in the competition between bureaucrats over the initiative of the policies.

Bureaucratic Politics in Industrial Development: Comparing Automobile Industrial Policies in Korea and Taiwan during the 1970-80s / Kim, Kyung Mi. - In: GUGJE JIYEOG YEON'GU - SEOUL DAEHAG'GYO. - ISSN 1226-7317. - 30:3(2021), pp. 37-68.

Bureaucratic Politics in Industrial Development: Comparing Automobile Industrial Policies in Korea and Taiwan during the 1970-80s

Kyung Mi Kim
Co-primo
Writing – Review & Editing
2021

Abstract

This paper analyzes the process of development of the automobile industries in Korea and Taiwan, focusing on their bureaucratic politics based on discursive coordination. Despite similar conditions in the early 1970s, the automobile industries in Korea and Taiwan led to divergent paths, focusing on exports of finished cars and parts, respectively. This study holds that this difference is not an automatic result of a given industrial structure, but it came from the divergence of the automobile industrial policies in the two countries. Korea aimed to establish internationally competitive national champions by vertically integrating domestic firms, while Taiwan targeted niche market and fostered strategic suppliers for multinational companies by integrating into their global production system. However, unlike previous state-centered studies that focus on the cohesiveness and power distribution within the state, this paper emphasizes that the differentiation of the automobile industrial policies of the two countries, which started with similar goals, is the result of efforts to justify their policies within the state as well as socially in the competition between bureaucrats over the initiative of the policies.
2021
automobile industry, industrial policy, bureaucratic politics, Korea, Taiwan
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Bureaucratic Politics in Industrial Development: Comparing Automobile Industrial Policies in Korea and Taiwan during the 1970-80s / Kim, Kyung Mi. - In: GUGJE JIYEOG YEON'GU - SEOUL DAEHAG'GYO. - ISSN 1226-7317. - 30:3(2021), pp. 37-68.
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1730097
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact