As the offshore wind industry expands into southeast Asia and west coast of USA, the seismic considerations become important in the design of the foundations, especially when liquefaction of shallow layers can occur under seismic loading. This paper presents centrifuge modelling of three foundation systems for offshore wind turbines installed in liquefiable soil, specifically a monopile, a composite system with a monopile and an outrigger, and an outrigger only system. The study discusses the performance of the three foundations in supporting identical offshore wind turbines subjected to a combination of operational and earthquake loading. The rotational stiffness of these three foundations is investigated before, during and after the seismic loading. The key findings suggest that the monopile experiences earthquake-induced rotation exceeding the allowable threshold recommended by DNV-ST-0126 (2021) and DNV-RP-0585 (2021). Although the hybrid foundation is expected to perform better compared to the monopile and the outrigger as separate foundations, the outrigger as a standalone structure is the foundation that exhibits less rotation. However, this advantage comes at the cost of larger settlements. Overall, the outrigger only foundation provided a reasonably consistent solution for supporting offshore wind turbines in areas prone to liquefaction induced by earthquakes.

Investigating alternative foundation systems for offshore wind turbines in liquefiable soils / Español-Espinel, Carlos; Gaudio, Domenico; Madabhushi, GOPAL PHANI SANTANA. - In: GEOTECHNIQUE. - ISSN 0016-8505. - (2024). [10.1680/jgeot.24.01059]

Investigating alternative foundation systems for offshore wind turbines in liquefiable soils

Domenico Gaudio
Secondo
;
Gopal Santana Phani Madabhushi
Ultimo
2024

Abstract

As the offshore wind industry expands into southeast Asia and west coast of USA, the seismic considerations become important in the design of the foundations, especially when liquefaction of shallow layers can occur under seismic loading. This paper presents centrifuge modelling of three foundation systems for offshore wind turbines installed in liquefiable soil, specifically a monopile, a composite system with a monopile and an outrigger, and an outrigger only system. The study discusses the performance of the three foundations in supporting identical offshore wind turbines subjected to a combination of operational and earthquake loading. The rotational stiffness of these three foundations is investigated before, during and after the seismic loading. The key findings suggest that the monopile experiences earthquake-induced rotation exceeding the allowable threshold recommended by DNV-ST-0126 (2021) and DNV-RP-0585 (2021). Although the hybrid foundation is expected to perform better compared to the monopile and the outrigger as separate foundations, the outrigger as a standalone structure is the foundation that exhibits less rotation. However, this advantage comes at the cost of larger settlements. Overall, the outrigger only foundation provided a reasonably consistent solution for supporting offshore wind turbines in areas prone to liquefaction induced by earthquakes.
2024
offshore renewable energy; liquefaction; centrifuge modelling; foundation engineering; seismic engineering
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Investigating alternative foundation systems for offshore wind turbines in liquefiable soils / Español-Espinel, Carlos; Gaudio, Domenico; Madabhushi, GOPAL PHANI SANTANA. - In: GEOTECHNIQUE. - ISSN 0016-8505. - (2024). [10.1680/jgeot.24.01059]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Espinel_Investigating_2024.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 2.07 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.07 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1729632
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact