: The integration of machine learning (ML) classification techniques into migraine research has offered new insights into the pathophysiology and classification of migraine types and subtypes. However, inconsistencies in study design, lack of methodological transparency, and the absence of external validation limit the impact and reproducibility of such studies. This paper presents a framework of six essential recommendations for evaluating ML-based classification in migraine research: (1) group homogenization by clinical phenotype, attack frequency, comorbidity, therapy, and demographics; (2) defining adequate sample size; (3) quality control of collected and preprocessed data; (4) transparent training, testing, and performance evaluation of ML models, including strategies for data splitting, overfitting control, and feature selection; (5) interpretability of results with clinical relevance; and (6) open data and code sharing to facilitate reproducibility. These recommendations aim to balance the trade-off between model generalization and precision while encouraging collaborative standardization across the ML and headache communities. Furthermore, this framework intends to stimulate discussion toward forming a consortium to establish definitive guidelines for ML-based classification research in migraine field.

Machine learning classification meets migraine. Recommendations for study evaluation / Petrušić, Igor; Savić, A Andrej; Mitrović, Katarina; Bačanin, Nebojša; Sebastianelli, Gabriele; Secci, Daniele; Coppola, Gianluca. - In: THE JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN. - ISSN 1129-2377. - 25:1(2024). [10.1186/s10194-024-01924-x]

Machine learning classification meets migraine. Recommendations for study evaluation

Sebastianelli, Gabriele;Coppola, Gianluca
2024

Abstract

: The integration of machine learning (ML) classification techniques into migraine research has offered new insights into the pathophysiology and classification of migraine types and subtypes. However, inconsistencies in study design, lack of methodological transparency, and the absence of external validation limit the impact and reproducibility of such studies. This paper presents a framework of six essential recommendations for evaluating ML-based classification in migraine research: (1) group homogenization by clinical phenotype, attack frequency, comorbidity, therapy, and demographics; (2) defining adequate sample size; (3) quality control of collected and preprocessed data; (4) transparent training, testing, and performance evaluation of ML models, including strategies for data splitting, overfitting control, and feature selection; (5) interpretability of results with clinical relevance; and (6) open data and code sharing to facilitate reproducibility. These recommendations aim to balance the trade-off between model generalization and precision while encouraging collaborative standardization across the ML and headache communities. Furthermore, this framework intends to stimulate discussion toward forming a consortium to establish definitive guidelines for ML-based classification research in migraine field.
2024
benchmark; data quality; machine learning classification models; migraine types; model interpretability; model reproducibility
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Machine learning classification meets migraine. Recommendations for study evaluation / Petrušić, Igor; Savić, A Andrej; Mitrović, Katarina; Bačanin, Nebojša; Sebastianelli, Gabriele; Secci, Daniele; Coppola, Gianluca. - In: THE JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN. - ISSN 1129-2377. - 25:1(2024). [10.1186/s10194-024-01924-x]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Petrusic_Machine-learning_2024.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 938.17 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
938.17 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1729042
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact