Ranking, recommendation, and retrieval systems are widely used in online platforms and other societal systems, including e-commerce, media-streaming, admissions, gig platforms, and hiring. In the recent past, a large "fair ranking"research literature has been developed around making these systems fair to the individuals, providers, or content that are being ranked. Most of this literature defines fairness for a single instance of retrieval, or as a simple additive notion for multiple instances of retrievals over time. This work provides a critical overview of this literature, detailing the often context-specific concerns that such approaches miss: the gap between high ranking placements and true provider utility, spillovers and compounding effects over time, induced strategic incentives, and the effect of statistical uncertainty. We then provide a path forward for a more holistic and impact-oriented fair ranking research agenda, including methodological lessons from other fields and the role of the broader stakeholder community in overcoming data bottlenecks and designing effective regulatory environments.

Fair ranking: a critical review, challenges, and future directions / Patro, G. K.; Porcaro, L.; Mitchell, L.; Zhang, Q.; Zehlike, M.; Garg, N.. - (2022), pp. 1929-1942. ( 5th ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT 2022 Seoul; Republic of Korea ) [10.1145/3531146.3533238].

Fair ranking: a critical review, challenges, and future directions

Porcaro L.
Secondo
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2022

Abstract

Ranking, recommendation, and retrieval systems are widely used in online platforms and other societal systems, including e-commerce, media-streaming, admissions, gig platforms, and hiring. In the recent past, a large "fair ranking"research literature has been developed around making these systems fair to the individuals, providers, or content that are being ranked. Most of this literature defines fairness for a single instance of retrieval, or as a simple additive notion for multiple instances of retrievals over time. This work provides a critical overview of this literature, detailing the often context-specific concerns that such approaches miss: the gap between high ranking placements and true provider utility, spillovers and compounding effects over time, induced strategic incentives, and the effect of statistical uncertainty. We then provide a path forward for a more holistic and impact-oriented fair ranking research agenda, including methodological lessons from other fields and the role of the broader stakeholder community in overcoming data bottlenecks and designing effective regulatory environments.
2022
5th ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT 2022
Algorithmic Impact Assessment; Exposure; Fairness; Ranking; Recommendation; Strategic Behaviour
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
Fair ranking: a critical review, challenges, and future directions / Patro, G. K.; Porcaro, L.; Mitchell, L.; Zhang, Q.; Zehlike, M.; Garg, N.. - (2022), pp. 1929-1942. ( 5th ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT 2022 Seoul; Republic of Korea ) [10.1145/3531146.3533238].
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Patro_Fair-ranking_2022.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 584.13 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
584.13 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1728786
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 51
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 32
social impact