Usefulness of empiric superior vena cava isolation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BackgroundThe long-term success rate of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is suboptimal due to the presence of non-pulmonary vein (PV) foci that can trigger atrial fibrillation (AF) in up to 11%. Among non-PV triggers, the superior vena cava (SVC) is a major site of origin of ectopic beats initiating AF.ObjectiveTo compare data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing PVI + empiric SVC isolation (SVCI) versus PVI alone in terms of AF recurrence, procedure-related complications, and fluoroscopic and procedural times.MethodsA search of online scientific libraries (from inception to April 1, 2024) was performed. Four RCTs were considered eligible for the meta-analysis totaling 600 patients of whom 287 receiving PVI + SVCI and 313 receiving PVI alone.ResultsIn the overall population, SVCI + PVI was associated with a non-significant reduction of AF recurrence at follow-up (0.66 [0.43;1.00], p = 0.05, I2 0%). In patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF), a significant reduction of AF recurrence was related to SVCI + PVI (11.7%) as compared to PVI alone (19.9%) (0.54 [0.32;0.92], p = 0.02, I2 0%). No statistical differences were found among the groups in terms of fluoroscopic (3.31 [- 0.8;7.41], p = 0.11, I2 = 91%), procedural times (5.69 [- 9.78;21.16], p = 0.47, I2 = 81%), and complications (1.06 [0.33;3.44], p = 0.92, I2 = 0%).ConclusionThe addition of SVCI to PVI in patients in PAF is associated with a significant lower rate of AF recurrence at follow-up, without increasing complication rates and procedural and fluoroscopy times.