Introduction: The efficacy and safety of emerging therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have never been compared in specific subgroups of patients. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Registry, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE libraries were used to extract data. We used the following keywords: (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction OR HFrEF) AND (treatment OR therapy) OR (cardiovascular death) OR (hospitalization for heart failure). We compared randomized clinical trials for HFrEF emerging therapies focusing on the elderly (patients >65 years old and >75 years old), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min), patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), coronary heart disease (CAD), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV, women, patients on sacubitril/valsartan (S/V). The primary outcome was the efficacy composite endpoint of cardiovascular death (CVD) and HF hospitalization (HFH). Results: S/V significantly reduced the primary outcome in patients >65 years old (RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.68-0.94) and with CKD (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.69-0.90); dapagliflozin in patients >65 (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.60-0.86) and >75 years old (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.53-0.87), in those with CKD (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.59-0.88), DM (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.63-0.89), and CAD (RR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.65-0.92); empagliflozin in patients >65 years old (RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.66-0.93), those with DM (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.60-0.86), CAD (RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.68-0.99), women (RR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.44-0.79), and in patients on S/V (RR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.45-0.91); vericiguat in patients with CKD (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73-0.97) and NYHA class III/IV (RR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.77-0.98); omecamtiv mecarbil in patients with CAD (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.82-0.99) and NYHA III/IV (RR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.80-0.97). Conclusion: Emerging HFrEF therapies show a clinical benefit with the reduction of the primary composite endpoint of CVD and HFH, with each drug being more effective in specific patient population.
Efficacy of modern therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in specific population subgroups. a systematic review and network meta-analysis / Lavalle, Carlo; Mariani, Marco Valerio; Severino, Paolo; Palombi, Marta; Trivigno, Sara; D'Amato, Andrea; Silvetti, Giacomo; Pierucci, Nicola; Di Lullo, Luca; Chimenti, Cristina; Summaria, Francesco; Ronco, Claudio; Badagliacca, Roberto; Miraldi, Fabio; Vizza, Carmine Dario. - In: CARDIORENAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 1664-3828. - 14:1(2024), pp. 570-580. [10.1159/000541393]
Efficacy of modern therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction in specific population subgroups. a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Lavalle, Carlo;Mariani, Marco Valerio;Severino, Paolo;Palombi, Marta;Trivigno, Sara;Silvetti, Giacomo;Pierucci, Nicola;Chimenti, Cristina;Badagliacca, Roberto;Miraldi, Fabio;Vizza, Carmine Dario
2024
Abstract
Introduction: The efficacy and safety of emerging therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have never been compared in specific subgroups of patients. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Registry, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE libraries were used to extract data. We used the following keywords: (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction OR HFrEF) AND (treatment OR therapy) OR (cardiovascular death) OR (hospitalization for heart failure). We compared randomized clinical trials for HFrEF emerging therapies focusing on the elderly (patients >65 years old and >75 years old), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min), patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), coronary heart disease (CAD), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV, women, patients on sacubitril/valsartan (S/V). The primary outcome was the efficacy composite endpoint of cardiovascular death (CVD) and HF hospitalization (HFH). Results: S/V significantly reduced the primary outcome in patients >65 years old (RR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.68-0.94) and with CKD (RR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.69-0.90); dapagliflozin in patients >65 (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.60-0.86) and >75 years old (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.53-0.87), in those with CKD (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.59-0.88), DM (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.63-0.89), and CAD (RR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.65-0.92); empagliflozin in patients >65 years old (RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.66-0.93), those with DM (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.60-0.86), CAD (RR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.68-0.99), women (RR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.44-0.79), and in patients on S/V (RR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.45-0.91); vericiguat in patients with CKD (RR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73-0.97) and NYHA class III/IV (RR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.77-0.98); omecamtiv mecarbil in patients with CAD (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.82-0.99) and NYHA III/IV (RR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.80-0.97). Conclusion: Emerging HFrEF therapies show a clinical benefit with the reduction of the primary composite endpoint of CVD and HFH, with each drug being more effective in specific patient population.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Lavalle_Efficacy_2024.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
662.11 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
662.11 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.