This paper explores the role of Transitional Justice in the democratization processes of post-Soviet states, with a focus on Ukraine, Russia, and Belarus. It argues that addressing the human rights violations and systemic corruption inherited from authoritarian regimes is fundamental for a successful democratic transition. Ukraine’s journey towards democratization, distinct from Russia and Belarus, is analyzed through its historical pursuit of independence and nation-building, juxtaposed against the Baltic and Visegrad countries as comparative examples. Key factors, such as leadership, civil society, and the fight against corruption, are evaluated to illustrate divergence in democratic trajectories. The paper emphasizes that confronting historical injustices, fostering transparent narratives, and prosecuting former regime crimes are pivotal to breaking cycles of authoritarianism. By examining Ukraine's recent anti-corruption efforts and the broader implications of truth-seeking and accountability, this study underscores the vital connection between historical justice, societal trust, and democratic consolidation in post-Soviet contexts.
Transitional Justice as a Part of Democratic Transition in Post-Communist Countries / Iashchenko, Iuliia. - (2024), pp. 519-526. [10.13129/979-12-80899-13-2]
Transitional Justice as a Part of Democratic Transition in Post-Communist Countries
Iuliia Iashchenko
2024
Abstract
This paper explores the role of Transitional Justice in the democratization processes of post-Soviet states, with a focus on Ukraine, Russia, and Belarus. It argues that addressing the human rights violations and systemic corruption inherited from authoritarian regimes is fundamental for a successful democratic transition. Ukraine’s journey towards democratization, distinct from Russia and Belarus, is analyzed through its historical pursuit of independence and nation-building, juxtaposed against the Baltic and Visegrad countries as comparative examples. Key factors, such as leadership, civil society, and the fight against corruption, are evaluated to illustrate divergence in democratic trajectories. The paper emphasizes that confronting historical injustices, fostering transparent narratives, and prosecuting former regime crimes are pivotal to breaking cycles of authoritarianism. By examining Ukraine's recent anti-corruption efforts and the broader implications of truth-seeking and accountability, this study underscores the vital connection between historical justice, societal trust, and democratic consolidation in post-Soviet contexts.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.