Over the past decades, there have been great advancements in the antithrombotic management of patients undergoing percutaneous interventions, but most of the available evidence derives from studies conducted in the setting of cardiac interventions. Antithrombotic treatment regimens used in patients undergoing percutaneous cardiac interventions, in particular coronary, are frequently extrapolated to patients undergoing noncardiac interventions. However, the differences in risk profile of the population treated and the types of interventions performed may translate into differences is the safety and efficacy associated with antithrombotic therapy. Noncardiac percutaneous interventions are commonly performed in patients at high bleeding risk, which may indeed impact outcomes, hence underscoring the importance of risk stratification to guide clinical decision-making processes. In this review, we appraise the available evidence on antithrombotic therapy in high-bleeding-risk patients undergoing noncardiac percutaneous interventions.
Antithrombotic therapy in high bleeding risk. Part II / Galli, Mattia; Gragnano, Felice; Berteotti, Martina; Marcucci, Rossella; Gargiulo, Giuseppe; Calabrò, Paolo; Terracciano, Fabrizia; Andreotti, Felicita; Patti, Giuseppe; De Caterina, Raffaele; Capodanno, Davide; Valgimigli, Marco; Mehran, Roxana; Perrone Filardi, Pasquale; Cirillo, Plinio; Angiolillo, Dominick J.. - In: JACC. CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS. - ISSN 1876-7591. - 17:20(2024), pp. 2325-2336. [10.1016/j.jcin.2024.09.011]
Antithrombotic therapy in high bleeding risk. Part II
Mattia GalliPrimo
;
2024
Abstract
Over the past decades, there have been great advancements in the antithrombotic management of patients undergoing percutaneous interventions, but most of the available evidence derives from studies conducted in the setting of cardiac interventions. Antithrombotic treatment regimens used in patients undergoing percutaneous cardiac interventions, in particular coronary, are frequently extrapolated to patients undergoing noncardiac interventions. However, the differences in risk profile of the population treated and the types of interventions performed may translate into differences is the safety and efficacy associated with antithrombotic therapy. Noncardiac percutaneous interventions are commonly performed in patients at high bleeding risk, which may indeed impact outcomes, hence underscoring the importance of risk stratification to guide clinical decision-making processes. In this review, we appraise the available evidence on antithrombotic therapy in high-bleeding-risk patients undergoing noncardiac percutaneous interventions.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Galli_Antithrombotic_2024.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
643.83 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
643.83 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.