Background To explore how urologists manage prostate cancer (PCa) screening and treatment in patients undergoing endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP). Methods A team of experts in EEP collaboratively formulated the survey questions through an interactive process. The survey opened in January 2024 and closed in February 2024.Results102 urologists responded, revealing that most use PSA and digital rectal examination for screening, with high PSA and abnormal DRE prompting prostate MRI. 75% perform pre-EEP biopsies. For incidental low-grade PCa, active surveillance is preferred. For intermediate-grade PCa, most use PSA and MRI for workup, often choosing active surveillance if post-EEP biopsies are negative. There's no consensus on abnormal post-operative PSA thresholds. Conclusions While urologists are aware of PCa management in EEP candidates, future work should focus on developing optimal post-EEP screening protocols.
Prostate cancer screening and management in patients candidate for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: an international survey / Uleri, Alessandro; Cornu, Jean Nicolas; Pradere, Benjamin; Herrmann, Thomas R W; Misrai, Vincent; Roupret, Morgan; De Nunzio, Cosimo; Hashim, Hashim; Ploussard, Guillaume; Baboudjian, Michael. - In: PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES. - ISSN 1365-7852. - (2024). [10.1038/s41391-024-00909-w]
Prostate cancer screening and management in patients candidate for endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: an international survey
De Nunzio, Cosimo;
2024
Abstract
Background To explore how urologists manage prostate cancer (PCa) screening and treatment in patients undergoing endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP). Methods A team of experts in EEP collaboratively formulated the survey questions through an interactive process. The survey opened in January 2024 and closed in February 2024.Results102 urologists responded, revealing that most use PSA and digital rectal examination for screening, with high PSA and abnormal DRE prompting prostate MRI. 75% perform pre-EEP biopsies. For incidental low-grade PCa, active surveillance is preferred. For intermediate-grade PCa, most use PSA and MRI for workup, often choosing active surveillance if post-EEP biopsies are negative. There's no consensus on abnormal post-operative PSA thresholds. Conclusions While urologists are aware of PCa management in EEP candidates, future work should focus on developing optimal post-EEP screening protocols.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Uleri_Prostate-cancer_2024.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
325.5 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
325.5 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.