In the first part of this paper, I discuss the autenticity of Fulgentius’ quotations. Following Baldwin and Wolff, I try to show that very often the grammarian is not culpable; instead, I provide some arguments which demonstrate that his erroneous quotations are more likely derived from his sources. In the second part, the paper aims to discuss the text of Apul. met. 5, 9, in order to show that Fulgentius’ quote transmits reasonably the correct lectio.
Una variante apuleiana in Fulgenzio (serm. ant. 17, 116-117 H.) / Seretti, Emanuele. - In: REVUE DES ÉTUDES TARDO-ANTIQUES. - ISSN 2115-8266. - 9(2019), pp. 121-135.
Una variante apuleiana in Fulgenzio (serm. ant. 17, 116-117 H.)
Emanuele Seretti
2019
Abstract
In the first part of this paper, I discuss the autenticity of Fulgentius’ quotations. Following Baldwin and Wolff, I try to show that very often the grammarian is not culpable; instead, I provide some arguments which demonstrate that his erroneous quotations are more likely derived from his sources. In the second part, the paper aims to discuss the text of Apul. met. 5, 9, in order to show that Fulgentius’ quote transmits reasonably the correct lectio.File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
