This article discusses, once more, the authenticity of Verg. Ecl. 2, 32-33. These odd verses, irrelevant for Corydon’s “court”, fragment the syntax and have no connection with the previous or the following parts of the eclogue; moreover, neither Theocritus nor Vergil’s imitators (Calpurnius, Ovid, and Nemesianus) use similar verses. On the other hand, the excision of vv. 32-33 could restore, according to Maury’s theory, the symmetrical disposition of Ecl. 2-8 and Ecl. 3-7.
L’emulo di Pan. Una nota a Verg. Ecl. 2, 32-33 / Seretti, Emanuele. - In: RATIONES RERUM. - ISSN 2284-2497. - 15:(2020), pp. 53-62.
L’emulo di Pan. Una nota a Verg. Ecl. 2, 32-33
Emanuele Seretti
2020
Abstract
This article discusses, once more, the authenticity of Verg. Ecl. 2, 32-33. These odd verses, irrelevant for Corydon’s “court”, fragment the syntax and have no connection with the previous or the following parts of the eclogue; moreover, neither Theocritus nor Vergil’s imitators (Calpurnius, Ovid, and Nemesianus) use similar verses. On the other hand, the excision of vv. 32-33 could restore, according to Maury’s theory, the symmetrical disposition of Ecl. 2-8 and Ecl. 3-7.File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
