Theoretical models of autobiographical memory often describe two distinct retrieval modes which can be utilized to retrieve past events. Direct retrieval is considered effortless and immediate, whilst generative retrieval requires a deliberate search process to successfully access a memory. To our knowledge, no study has explored how these two retrieval modes differ in relation to their neural temporal activations. In the present study, 26 participants completed a memory task whilst their brain neurophysiological activity was recorded via a 40-channel electroencephalography cap. Single words were presented on screen and participants were instructed to press the spacebar to indicate the moment a specific autobiographical event was accessed. After reporting which retrieval mode was used, participants elaborated the memory in as much detail as possible and answered a series of follow up questions (e.g., how personally significant the event was). Preliminary analysis of behavioral data revealed that participants accessed direct memories significantly faster and direct memories were rated as significantly more detailed and personally significant. Results from ongoing EEG data analysis will be discussed in relation to autobiographical memory theories.

Neurophysiological distinctions between direct and generative autobiographical memory retrieval routes: an EEG study / Talbot, Jessica; Convertino, Gianmarco; Mcgeown, William; Mazzoni, Giuliana. - (2024). (Intervento presentato al convegno Autobiographical Processing and Psychopathology 2024 tenutosi a Leuven; Belgium).

Neurophysiological distinctions between direct and generative autobiographical memory retrieval routes: an EEG study

Jessica Talbot
Primo
;
Gianmarco Convertino
Secondo
;
Giuliana Mazzoni
Ultimo
2024

Abstract

Theoretical models of autobiographical memory often describe two distinct retrieval modes which can be utilized to retrieve past events. Direct retrieval is considered effortless and immediate, whilst generative retrieval requires a deliberate search process to successfully access a memory. To our knowledge, no study has explored how these two retrieval modes differ in relation to their neural temporal activations. In the present study, 26 participants completed a memory task whilst their brain neurophysiological activity was recorded via a 40-channel electroencephalography cap. Single words were presented on screen and participants were instructed to press the spacebar to indicate the moment a specific autobiographical event was accessed. After reporting which retrieval mode was used, participants elaborated the memory in as much detail as possible and answered a series of follow up questions (e.g., how personally significant the event was). Preliminary analysis of behavioral data revealed that participants accessed direct memories significantly faster and direct memories were rated as significantly more detailed and personally significant. Results from ongoing EEG data analysis will be discussed in relation to autobiographical memory theories.
2024
Autobiographical Processing and Psychopathology 2024
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04d Abstract in atti di convegno
Neurophysiological distinctions between direct and generative autobiographical memory retrieval routes: an EEG study / Talbot, Jessica; Convertino, Gianmarco; Mcgeown, William; Mazzoni, Giuliana. - (2024). (Intervento presentato al convegno Autobiographical Processing and Psychopathology 2024 tenutosi a Leuven; Belgium).
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1726172
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact