Purpose: Leaks after sleeve gastrectomy remain a deadly complication significantly affecting outcomes and medical costs. The aim of the present review is to provide an updated decalogue on leak prevention. Methods: Risk factors of leakage after LSG were examined based on an extensive review of literature (in period time 2016-2024) and summary of evidence was provided using Oxford levels of evidence scale. Results: Pathogenesis of leakage after LSG still remain related to ischemic and mechanical factors and, therefore, no new evidence has been reported. Conversely, some technical aspect of the procedure has changed: bougie size, antrum resection, staple line reinforcement, and intraoperative leak testing. Conclusions: Bougie size 36 F is effective and safe achieving similar leakage rate compared to larger bougie sizes (EL:2) 2024 UPDATE; There is no significant difference in the leak rate between restrictive (< 6 cm) and conservative (6 cm) antrum resection (EL: 1) 2024 UPDATE; Surgical experience and case volume affect the leak rate more consistently than every kind of SLR (EL: 2) 2024 UPDATE; Intraoperative leak test after LSG represents a decision based on surgeon preference in absence of standardization (endoscopy, bubble test, methylene blue, indocyanine green.) and strong detection/prevention rate (EL: 3) 2024 UPDATE.

Leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: 2024 update on risk factors / Iossa, Angelo; Martini, Lorenzo; De Angelis, Francesco; Micalizzi, Alessandra; Michael Watkins, Brad; Silecchia, Gianfranco; Cavallaro, Giuseppe. - In: LANGENBECK'S ARCHIVES OF SURGERY. - ISSN 1435-2451. - (2024). [10.1007/s00423-024-03424-7]

Leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: 2024 update on risk factors

Angelo Iossa;Lorenzo Martini;Gianfranco Silecchia;Giuseppe Cavallaro
2024

Abstract

Purpose: Leaks after sleeve gastrectomy remain a deadly complication significantly affecting outcomes and medical costs. The aim of the present review is to provide an updated decalogue on leak prevention. Methods: Risk factors of leakage after LSG were examined based on an extensive review of literature (in period time 2016-2024) and summary of evidence was provided using Oxford levels of evidence scale. Results: Pathogenesis of leakage after LSG still remain related to ischemic and mechanical factors and, therefore, no new evidence has been reported. Conversely, some technical aspect of the procedure has changed: bougie size, antrum resection, staple line reinforcement, and intraoperative leak testing. Conclusions: Bougie size 36 F is effective and safe achieving similar leakage rate compared to larger bougie sizes (EL:2) 2024 UPDATE; There is no significant difference in the leak rate between restrictive (< 6 cm) and conservative (6 cm) antrum resection (EL: 1) 2024 UPDATE; Surgical experience and case volume affect the leak rate more consistently than every kind of SLR (EL: 2) 2024 UPDATE; Intraoperative leak test after LSG represents a decision based on surgeon preference in absence of standardization (endoscopy, bubble test, methylene blue, indocyanine green.) and strong detection/prevention rate (EL: 3) 2024 UPDATE.
2024
bariatric surgery, sleeve gastrectomy, laparoscopy
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: 2024 update on risk factors / Iossa, Angelo; Martini, Lorenzo; De Angelis, Francesco; Micalizzi, Alessandra; Michael Watkins, Brad; Silecchia, Gianfranco; Cavallaro, Giuseppe. - In: LANGENBECK'S ARCHIVES OF SURGERY. - ISSN 1435-2451. - (2024). [10.1007/s00423-024-03424-7]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1725323
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact