: This review highlights the increasing prevalence of fraudulent data and publications in medical research, emphasizing the potential harm to patients and the erosion of trust in the medical community. It discusses the impact of low-quality studies on clinical guidelines and patient safety, emphasizing the need for prompt identification. The review proposes using machine learning and artificial intelligence as potential tools to detect anomalies, plagiarism, and data manipulation, potentially improving the peer review process. Despite the acknowledgment of this problem and the growing number of retractions, the review notes a lack of focus on the clinical implications of forged evidence.
Fraud in Medical Publications / Nato, Consolato Gianluca; Bilotta, Federico. - In: ANESTHESIOLOGY CLINICS. - ISSN 1932-2275. - 42:4(2024). [10.1016/j.anclin.2024.02.004]
Fraud in Medical Publications
Nato, Consolato Gianluca;Bilotta, Federico
2024
Abstract
: This review highlights the increasing prevalence of fraudulent data and publications in medical research, emphasizing the potential harm to patients and the erosion of trust in the medical community. It discusses the impact of low-quality studies on clinical guidelines and patient safety, emphasizing the need for prompt identification. The review proposes using machine learning and artificial intelligence as potential tools to detect anomalies, plagiarism, and data manipulation, potentially improving the peer review process. Despite the acknowledgment of this problem and the growing number of retractions, the review notes a lack of focus on the clinical implications of forged evidence.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


