Introduction and Objectives Effective mosquito vector monitoring is increasingly needed to optimize control interventions and predicting risk of pathogen transmission. However, conventional methods are time- and labor-intensive and difficult to implement on a large spatial and temporal scale. Recently, an optical sensor combined with a supervised machine learning algorithm (Vectrack), was developed with the goal to allow automatic count and identification of adult mosquitoes in conventional BG-traps. Here we summarize the results of field experiments carried out in summer 2023 in Italy to evaluate: (i) the accuracy of Vectrack in counting and identifying Aedes and Culex adults, and (ii) whether BG-trap catching capacity is affected by the sensor presence. The experiments also provided the opportunity to estimate the capture rate of BG-traps based on the known capture rate of Sticky Traps. Materials and Methods The experimental design implied the rotation every 48h of three types of traps – one BG-Mosquitaire (BG-M), one BG-M equipped with the sensor, and 4 Sticky Traps (considered as a single trap due to their lower catching capacity) – in three sites within an area of about 1,000m2. The same experimental design was carried out in 4 Italian provinces (Bergamo, Padua, Rome, Naples) and replicated 3 times/area. Collected mosquitoes were counted and identified both automatically by the Vectrack and by visual inspections. Results, Discussion and Conclusion The capture performance of the BG-M with and without Vectrack was comparable both overall and when assessed against Aedes and Culex, or sexes (females, males) (Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference method, p-value NS). High correlation was observed in Aedes and Culex counts between Vectrack and operator (Pearson cor 0.985, pval <0.0001). Overall, results support Vectrack high potential for continuous monitoring with minimal human effort and opened the possibility of unprecedented studies on mosquito seasonal and circadian rhythms in 2024.
Testing a novel Optical Sensor for Aedes and Culex adult automatic count and identification and BG-trap capture rate determination / Micocci, Martina; Bernardini, Ilaria; Soresinetti, Laura; Varone, Marianna; DI LILLO, Paola; Severini, Francesco; Montarsi, Fabrizio; Epis, Sara; Salvemini, Marco; Manica, Mattia; DELLA TORRE, Alessandra. - (2024), pp. 84-84. (Intervento presentato al convegno ONE HEALTH IN ACTION: supporting and accelerating the bridging of the vertebrate and plant health communities tenutosi a Montpellier, France).
Testing a novel Optical Sensor for Aedes and Culex adult automatic count and identification and BG-trap capture rate determination
Martina MICOCCI;Ilaria BERNARDINI;Fabrizio MONTARSI;Mattia MANICA;Alessandra DELLA TORRE
2024
Abstract
Introduction and Objectives Effective mosquito vector monitoring is increasingly needed to optimize control interventions and predicting risk of pathogen transmission. However, conventional methods are time- and labor-intensive and difficult to implement on a large spatial and temporal scale. Recently, an optical sensor combined with a supervised machine learning algorithm (Vectrack), was developed with the goal to allow automatic count and identification of adult mosquitoes in conventional BG-traps. Here we summarize the results of field experiments carried out in summer 2023 in Italy to evaluate: (i) the accuracy of Vectrack in counting and identifying Aedes and Culex adults, and (ii) whether BG-trap catching capacity is affected by the sensor presence. The experiments also provided the opportunity to estimate the capture rate of BG-traps based on the known capture rate of Sticky Traps. Materials and Methods The experimental design implied the rotation every 48h of three types of traps – one BG-Mosquitaire (BG-M), one BG-M equipped with the sensor, and 4 Sticky Traps (considered as a single trap due to their lower catching capacity) – in three sites within an area of about 1,000m2. The same experimental design was carried out in 4 Italian provinces (Bergamo, Padua, Rome, Naples) and replicated 3 times/area. Collected mosquitoes were counted and identified both automatically by the Vectrack and by visual inspections. Results, Discussion and Conclusion The capture performance of the BG-M with and without Vectrack was comparable both overall and when assessed against Aedes and Culex, or sexes (females, males) (Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference method, p-value NS). High correlation was observed in Aedes and Culex counts between Vectrack and operator (Pearson cor 0.985, pval <0.0001). Overall, results support Vectrack high potential for continuous monitoring with minimal human effort and opened the possibility of unprecedented studies on mosquito seasonal and circadian rhythms in 2024.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.