OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the association between the pre-extubation sum of eye and motor components of the Glasgow Coma Score (GCS-EM) and odds of extubation failure in patients with acute brain injury being liberated from mechanical ventilation.DESIGN:Secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter observational study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03400904).SETTING:Sixty-three hospital sites worldwide, with patient recruitment from January 2018 to November 2020.PATIENTS:One thousand one hundred fifty-two critically ill patients with acute brain injury, with a median age of 54 years, of whom 783 (68.0%) were male, 559 (48.5%) had traumatic brain injury, and 905 (78.6%) had a GCS-EM greater than 8 before extubation (scores range from 2 to 10).INTERVENTIONS:None.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:GCS-EM was computed in intubated patients on the day of extubation. The main outcome was extubation failure, defined as unplanned reintubation within 5 days of extubation. Analyses used multilevel logistic regression with adjustment for patient characteristics and a random intercept for hospital site. In the primary analysis, GCS-EM was not associated with extubation failure (odds ratio, 1.07 per additional point; 95% CI, 0.87-1.31). Findings were consistent in sensitivity analyses that: 1) used different adjustment covariates, 2) included a verbal estimate to derive an overall GCS, 3) accounted for missing data, 4) considered a 2-day time interval to define extubation failure, 5) accounted for competing risks, and 6) used a propensity score-based model. There was no association between GCS-EM and extubation outcome in subgroups defined by brain injury diagnosis or age.CONCLUSIONS:In this large, contemporary, multicenter cohort of patients with acute brain injury, we found no association between the GCS-EM and odds of extubation failure. However, few patients had a pre-extubation GCS-EM less than or equal to 8, and the possibility of a true prognostic association in patients with low scores is not excluded.

Evaluating the sum of eye and motor components of the glasgow coma score as a predictor of extubation failure in patients with acute brain injury / Taran, S., Perrot, B., Angriman, F., Cinotti, R., Abback, P.-S., Codorniu, A., Citerio, G., Ludovica Sala, V., Astuto, M., Tringali, E., Alampi, D., Rocco, M., Giuseppina Maugeri, J., Bellissima, A., Filippini, M., Lazzeri, N., Cortegiani, A., Ippolito, M., Robba, C., Battaglini, D., et al.. - In: CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE. - ISSN 1530-0293. - 52:8(2024), pp. 1258-1263. [10.1097/CCM.0000000000006283]

Evaluating the sum of eye and motor components of the glasgow coma score as a predictor of extubation failure in patients with acute brain injury

Tringali E.;Alampi D.;Rocco M.;Serrano A.;Khaled A.;
2024

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the association between the pre-extubation sum of eye and motor components of the Glasgow Coma Score (GCS-EM) and odds of extubation failure in patients with acute brain injury being liberated from mechanical ventilation.DESIGN:Secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter observational study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03400904).SETTING:Sixty-three hospital sites worldwide, with patient recruitment from January 2018 to November 2020.PATIENTS:One thousand one hundred fifty-two critically ill patients with acute brain injury, with a median age of 54 years, of whom 783 (68.0%) were male, 559 (48.5%) had traumatic brain injury, and 905 (78.6%) had a GCS-EM greater than 8 before extubation (scores range from 2 to 10).INTERVENTIONS:None.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:GCS-EM was computed in intubated patients on the day of extubation. The main outcome was extubation failure, defined as unplanned reintubation within 5 days of extubation. Analyses used multilevel logistic regression with adjustment for patient characteristics and a random intercept for hospital site. In the primary analysis, GCS-EM was not associated with extubation failure (odds ratio, 1.07 per additional point; 95% CI, 0.87-1.31). Findings were consistent in sensitivity analyses that: 1) used different adjustment covariates, 2) included a verbal estimate to derive an overall GCS, 3) accounted for missing data, 4) considered a 2-day time interval to define extubation failure, 5) accounted for competing risks, and 6) used a propensity score-based model. There was no association between GCS-EM and extubation outcome in subgroups defined by brain injury diagnosis or age.CONCLUSIONS:In this large, contemporary, multicenter cohort of patients with acute brain injury, we found no association between the GCS-EM and odds of extubation failure. However, few patients had a pre-extubation GCS-EM less than or equal to 8, and the possibility of a true prognostic association in patients with low scores is not excluded.
2024
acute brain injury; extubation failure; glasgow coma score; mechanical ventilation; ventilator liberation
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Evaluating the sum of eye and motor components of the glasgow coma score as a predictor of extubation failure in patients with acute brain injury / Taran, S., Perrot, B., Angriman, F., Cinotti, R., Abback, P.-S., Codorniu, A., Citerio, G., Ludovica Sala, V., Astuto, M., Tringali, E., Alampi, D., Rocco, M., Giuseppina Maugeri, J., Bellissima, A., Filippini, M., Lazzeri, N., Cortegiani, A., Ippolito, M., Robba, C., Battaglini, D., et al.. - In: CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE. - ISSN 1530-0293. - 52:8(2024), pp. 1258-1263. [10.1097/CCM.0000000000006283]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Taran_Evaluating-sum_2024.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 820.01 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
820.01 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1723740
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact