A computational error has been found in the formula used to convert polarization angle values from equatorial to Galactic coordinates as reported in Table 2 of our original article. This concerns only ?gal values in parenthesis, regarding the NIKA camera observations. An updated version of Table 2 is given in Table 1 with new values having been recomputed. The bottom panel of Fig. 6 of the original article has been updated accordingly (see Fig. 1). This correction, however, does not significantly affect the result of the weighted-average polarization angle, which is now equal to -87.8? instead of -87.7? , which is consistent within the uncertainty previously given. It is important to notice that the uncertainties associated with the polarization angle values are not affected by the coordinate change correction.
NIKA 150 GHz polarization observations of the Crab nebula and its spectral energy distribution (corrigendum) / Ritacco, A., Macias-Perez, J.F., Ponthieu, N., Adam, R., Ade, P., Andre, P., Aumont, J., Beelen, A., Benoit, A., Bideaud, A., Billot, N., Bourrion, O., Bracco, A., Calvo, M., Catalano, A., Coiffard, G., Comis, B., D'Addabbo, A., De Petris, M., Desert, F.-X., et al.. - In: ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS. - ISSN 0004-6361. - 664:(2022), pp. 1-2. [10.1051/0004-6361/201731551e]
NIKA 150 GHz polarization observations of the Crab nebula and its spectral energy distribution (corrigendum)
De Petris M.;Pascale E.;Pisano G.;
2022
Abstract
A computational error has been found in the formula used to convert polarization angle values from equatorial to Galactic coordinates as reported in Table 2 of our original article. This concerns only ?gal values in parenthesis, regarding the NIKA camera observations. An updated version of Table 2 is given in Table 1 with new values having been recomputed. The bottom panel of Fig. 6 of the original article has been updated accordingly (see Fig. 1). This correction, however, does not significantly affect the result of the weighted-average polarization angle, which is now equal to -87.8? instead of -87.7? , which is consistent within the uncertainty previously given. It is important to notice that the uncertainties associated with the polarization angle values are not affected by the coordinate change correction.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ritacco__NIKA2-corrigendum_2022.pdf
accesso aperto
Note: Articolo su rivista
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
130.8 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
130.8 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


