INTRODUCTION: Inguinal lymph nodes dissection (ILND) is recommended in patients presenting with high -risk penile (PC) or vulvar cancers (VC). Though, this surgical procedure is underused because of its anticipated morbidity. Minimally invasive approaches were proposed to minimize complications associated with open surgery. In this review, we analyze current available data exploring intra and perioperative outcomes of robot -assisted ILND (RAIL). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: On April 9 t h , 2023, a literature search was conducted using the PubMed and Scopus databases. The search employed the combination of the following terms: ("robotic assisted" OR "robot -assisted" OR "robotic") AND ("inguinal lymph node dissection" OR "lymphadenectomy") AND ("penile cancer" OR "vulvar cancer"). Out of the 404 identified articles, 18 were used for the present scoping review and their results were reported according to the PRISMA statement. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Data on 171 patients, ranging in age from 32 to 85 years, were obtained. Most of them (90.6%) harbored a penile squamous cell carcinoma and presented with no palpable nodes (85%). Operation time (OT) ranged between 45 and 300 min. Estimated blood loss varied from 10 to 300 mL. One single intra-operative complication was reported and one conversion to open was recorded. The lymph nodes (LNs) count spanned from 3 to 26 per groin, with 17 studies reporting a median yield >7 nodes. Hospital stay was 1-7 days, while the duration of drainage ranged from 4 to 72 days. Post -operative complications included lymphocele (22.2%; 0-100%), lymphedema (13.4%; 0-40%), cellulitis (11.1%; 0-25%), skin necrosis (8.7%; 0-15.4%). seroma (3.5%; 0-20%) and wound breakdown/ wound infection (2.9%; 0-10%). Out of the included studies, 7 provided at least a 12 -month follow-up, with recurrencefree rates ranging from 50% to 100% in patients affected by penile cancer and from 92% to 100% in vulvar cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence on RAIL for the treatment of PC and VC is limited. The approach appears to be safe and effective, as it provides an adequate lymph node yield while ensuring a minimally morbid postoperative course and a short hospital stay.
Robot-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy to treat penile and vulvar cancers: a scoping review / Brassetti, Aldo; Chiacchio, Giuseppe; Anceschi, Umberto; Bove, Alfredo; Ferriero, Mariaconsiglia; D'Annunzio, Simone; Misuraca, Leonardo; Guaglianone, Salvatore; Tuderti, Gabriele; Mastroianni, Riccardo; Tedesco, Francesco; Cacciatore, Loris; Proietti, Flavia; Flammia, Simone R; De Nunzio, Cosimo; Cozzi, Gabriele; Leonardo, Costantino; Galosi, Andrea B; Simone, Giuseppe. - In: MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY. - ISSN 2724-6442. - 76:3(2024), pp. 278-285. [10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05532-0]
Robot-assisted inguinal lymphadenectomy to treat penile and vulvar cancers: a scoping review
Brassetti, Aldo;Anceschi, Umberto;D'Annunzio, Simone;Misuraca, Leonardo;Tuderti, Gabriele;Mastroianni, Riccardo;Tedesco, Francesco;Proietti, Flavia;De Nunzio, Cosimo;Leonardo, Costantino;
2024
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Inguinal lymph nodes dissection (ILND) is recommended in patients presenting with high -risk penile (PC) or vulvar cancers (VC). Though, this surgical procedure is underused because of its anticipated morbidity. Minimally invasive approaches were proposed to minimize complications associated with open surgery. In this review, we analyze current available data exploring intra and perioperative outcomes of robot -assisted ILND (RAIL). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: On April 9 t h , 2023, a literature search was conducted using the PubMed and Scopus databases. The search employed the combination of the following terms: ("robotic assisted" OR "robot -assisted" OR "robotic") AND ("inguinal lymph node dissection" OR "lymphadenectomy") AND ("penile cancer" OR "vulvar cancer"). Out of the 404 identified articles, 18 were used for the present scoping review and their results were reported according to the PRISMA statement. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Data on 171 patients, ranging in age from 32 to 85 years, were obtained. Most of them (90.6%) harbored a penile squamous cell carcinoma and presented with no palpable nodes (85%). Operation time (OT) ranged between 45 and 300 min. Estimated blood loss varied from 10 to 300 mL. One single intra-operative complication was reported and one conversion to open was recorded. The lymph nodes (LNs) count spanned from 3 to 26 per groin, with 17 studies reporting a median yield >7 nodes. Hospital stay was 1-7 days, while the duration of drainage ranged from 4 to 72 days. Post -operative complications included lymphocele (22.2%; 0-100%), lymphedema (13.4%; 0-40%), cellulitis (11.1%; 0-25%), skin necrosis (8.7%; 0-15.4%). seroma (3.5%; 0-20%) and wound breakdown/ wound infection (2.9%; 0-10%). Out of the included studies, 7 provided at least a 12 -month follow-up, with recurrencefree rates ranging from 50% to 100% in patients affected by penile cancer and from 92% to 100% in vulvar cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence on RAIL for the treatment of PC and VC is limited. The approach appears to be safe and effective, as it provides an adequate lymph node yield while ensuring a minimally morbid postoperative course and a short hospital stay.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Brassetti_Robot-assisted-inguinal_2024.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
894.23 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
894.23 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.