In this investigation, a novel geothermal power plant was designed, combining absorption chiller units, PEMFC, EPEM, and ORC. We conducted a comprehensive case study across four continents—Asia, Oceania, Europe, and America—leveraging weather data from various cities to evaluate the system's efficacy. Our modeling utilized EES (Engineering Equation Solver) software, optimizing the setup via the RSM with three key objective functions: exergy efficiency, hydrogen production, and cost rate. The primary focus was on delivering electricity to residential properties during peak demand periods. Exploring six scenarios for organic fluids in organic Rankine cycles, we gauged energy, exergy, and overall system performance. The TOPSIS method led us to select scenario 3, employing R123 and R134a refrigerants, as the optimal choice. The results of the optimization showcased impressive figures: an exergy efficiency of 81.816%, a hydrogen production rate of 25.119 kg/h, and a cost rate of 15.967 $/h for the system's most efficient configuration. Economic analysis highlighted the organic Rankine cycle units 1 and 2 as the components with the highest costs. Our evaluation extended to various cities—Aomori, Grosseto, Lhasa, Wellington, and San Diego—assessing the electricity, heating, and cooling needs of residential complexes based on the system's performance.

Assessing PEM fuel cell performance in a geothermal Cogeneration system for peak-time energy storage / Assareh, E.; Ali, S. N.; Ghafariasl, P.; Hoseinzadeh, S.; Agarwal, N.; Lee, M.; Astiaso Garcia, D.. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY. - ISSN 0360-3199. - (2024). [10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.08.080]

Assessing PEM fuel cell performance in a geothermal Cogeneration system for peak-time energy storage

Hoseinzadeh S.;Astiaso Garcia D.
2024

Abstract

In this investigation, a novel geothermal power plant was designed, combining absorption chiller units, PEMFC, EPEM, and ORC. We conducted a comprehensive case study across four continents—Asia, Oceania, Europe, and America—leveraging weather data from various cities to evaluate the system's efficacy. Our modeling utilized EES (Engineering Equation Solver) software, optimizing the setup via the RSM with three key objective functions: exergy efficiency, hydrogen production, and cost rate. The primary focus was on delivering electricity to residential properties during peak demand periods. Exploring six scenarios for organic fluids in organic Rankine cycles, we gauged energy, exergy, and overall system performance. The TOPSIS method led us to select scenario 3, employing R123 and R134a refrigerants, as the optimal choice. The results of the optimization showcased impressive figures: an exergy efficiency of 81.816%, a hydrogen production rate of 25.119 kg/h, and a cost rate of 15.967 $/h for the system's most efficient configuration. Economic analysis highlighted the organic Rankine cycle units 1 and 2 as the components with the highest costs. Our evaluation extended to various cities—Aomori, Grosseto, Lhasa, Wellington, and San Diego—assessing the electricity, heating, and cooling needs of residential complexes based on the system's performance.
2024
Absorption chiller; EPEM; Geothermal energy; Organic rankine cycle (ORC); PEMFC
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Assessing PEM fuel cell performance in a geothermal Cogeneration system for peak-time energy storage / Assareh, E.; Ali, S. N.; Ghafariasl, P.; Hoseinzadeh, S.; Agarwal, N.; Lee, M.; Astiaso Garcia, D.. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY. - ISSN 0360-3199. - (2024). [10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.08.080]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Assareh_Assessing_2024.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.81 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.81 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1720033
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact