In all likelihood, Ascanius of Abdera was a philosopher who had a deep interest in Pyrrhonian thought. The only textual evidence about him is in Diogenes Laertius’ Life of Pyrrho (IX 61), in which one reads that, according to Ascanius, Pyrrho was the first to introduce akatalepsia (incomprehensibility/non-cognition) and epoche (suspended judgment). In this article, it is hypothesized that Ascanius is either a Pyrrhonian or a Democritean philosopher. There are good reasons in favor of either possibility. Although one necessarily keeps to the hypothetical level, it would seem more plausible that Ascanius was a Democritean thinker who, like other thinkers belonging to the Democritean tradition (for instance, Nausiphanes of Teos), had a strong interest in Pyrrhonian philosophy, probably in polemics with Arcesilaus’ Academy. Finally, the article also deals with the section of Plutarch’s Adversus Colotem devoted to Arcesilaus (1121F-1122A) and a column of the Epicurean Polystratus’ De contemptu (PHerc. 336/1150, XXI 17-29 Indelli).

Atomismo e pirronismo. L’identità filosofica di Ascanio di Abdera (Diog. Laert. IX 61) / Verde, F.. - In: RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA. - ISSN 0393-2516. - 2:79(2024), pp. 349-370.

Atomismo e pirronismo. L’identità filosofica di Ascanio di Abdera (Diog. Laert. IX 61)

VERDE F.
2024

Abstract

In all likelihood, Ascanius of Abdera was a philosopher who had a deep interest in Pyrrhonian thought. The only textual evidence about him is in Diogenes Laertius’ Life of Pyrrho (IX 61), in which one reads that, according to Ascanius, Pyrrho was the first to introduce akatalepsia (incomprehensibility/non-cognition) and epoche (suspended judgment). In this article, it is hypothesized that Ascanius is either a Pyrrhonian or a Democritean philosopher. There are good reasons in favor of either possibility. Although one necessarily keeps to the hypothetical level, it would seem more plausible that Ascanius was a Democritean thinker who, like other thinkers belonging to the Democritean tradition (for instance, Nausiphanes of Teos), had a strong interest in Pyrrhonian philosophy, probably in polemics with Arcesilaus’ Academy. Finally, the article also deals with the section of Plutarch’s Adversus Colotem devoted to Arcesilaus (1121F-1122A) and a column of the Epicurean Polystratus’ De contemptu (PHerc. 336/1150, XXI 17-29 Indelli).
2024
Ascanius of Abdera, Democritus, Pyrrho, Arcesilaus, Scepticism, Atomism, Pyrrhonism
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Atomismo e pirronismo. L’identità filosofica di Ascanio di Abdera (Diog. Laert. IX 61) / Verde, F.. - In: RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA. - ISSN 0393-2516. - 2:79(2024), pp. 349-370.
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1719075
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact