Operative and non-operative treatment of injury to solid abdominal organs in adult patients: a single center experience

Background: In major trauma, lesions of the parenchymatous organs are subject of a controversy as regards the choice between an operative management (OM) in the operating room and a non-operative management (NOM) associated or not with angiography/angioembolization (AG/AE). Methods: Retrospective study of all consecutive data of patients coded as "traumatic pathology" in the period between 2011 and 2021. Were enrolled 13740 entries of adult patients with abdominal injuries, including at least: either hepatic or splenic or renal injury of AAST-OIS I. The primary outcome was to establish the rate of efficacy, respectively of OM and NOM. The secondary outcome is to analyze General (CG) and Specific (CS) complications, mean ward and intensive care unit (ICU) hospital stays. Results: One hundred sixty-two patients were included with 89 splenic injuries, 70 hepatic and 50 renal lesions; 35 treated with OM and 127 with NOM +/- AG/AE. The CGs registered in OM patients are seven (20%); seven SCs (20%); four GCs+SCs (11.4%). The average hospital stay was 24.91 days; mean ICU hospital stay of 10.74; five deaths. The CGs registered are 22 (17%); 12 SCs (9.4%); three GCs+SCs (2.3%). Average hospital stays 18 days; mean ICU hospital stay of 3.15; 6 deaths. Failure of the NOM strategy was recorded in nine patients with a success rate of 92.91%. Conclusions: In OM the presence of numerous high-grade lesions leads to a rapid stabilization. The NOM has reduced the hospital stay and UTI hospitalization in a feasible and safe way in selected CT.