IntroductionThe aim of this study is to update a systematic review of instruments for evaluating the executive functions (EFs) in a pediatric population to assess their measurement properties.Area coveredStudies describing evaluation tools of EFs were systematically searched on four electronic databases: PubMed, EBSCO, Scopus, and Web of Science. To be included studies had to be on a population aged 0 to 18 were included. The individuals were either healthy or presented a neurodevelopment disorder. Risk of Bias was evaluated through the Consensus-based Standards to select the health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN).Expert opinionThe search was conducted on April 2023. Eighty-four papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study; the studies refer to 72 different evaluation tools of EFs. Most of the studies analyzed through a methodological quality analysis received an 'adequate' score. The instrument most mentioned was the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-2 (BRIEF2) in seven articles.
Evaluation instruments for executive functions in children and adolescents: an update of a systematic review / Cesari, A.; Galeoto, G.; Panuccio, F.; Simeon, R.; Berardi, A.. - In: EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH. - ISSN 1473-7167. - 24:4(2024), pp. 487-508. [10.1080/14737167.2024.2311872]
Evaluation instruments for executive functions in children and adolescents: an update of a systematic review
Galeoto G.Secondo
Conceptualization
;Panuccio F.Resources
;Simeon R.Penultimo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;Berardi A.
Ultimo
Methodology
2024
Abstract
IntroductionThe aim of this study is to update a systematic review of instruments for evaluating the executive functions (EFs) in a pediatric population to assess their measurement properties.Area coveredStudies describing evaluation tools of EFs were systematically searched on four electronic databases: PubMed, EBSCO, Scopus, and Web of Science. To be included studies had to be on a population aged 0 to 18 were included. The individuals were either healthy or presented a neurodevelopment disorder. Risk of Bias was evaluated through the Consensus-based Standards to select the health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN).Expert opinionThe search was conducted on April 2023. Eighty-four papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study; the studies refer to 72 different evaluation tools of EFs. Most of the studies analyzed through a methodological quality analysis received an 'adequate' score. The instrument most mentioned was the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-2 (BRIEF2) in seven articles.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.