Purpose: To define the accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in diagnosing persistent or recurrent neck metastases in previously irradiated patients. Methods: The study was performed according to the PRISMA-DTA guidelines. Results: A total of 382 FNACs were used for calculation of diagnostic accuracy parameters. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity in detecting malignant nodes were 69.1% (95% CI: 56.3%-80.7%; I2 = 79.5%) and 84.2% (95% CI: 71.8%-93.5%; I2 = 87.0%), respectively. Cumulative diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 16.54 (95% CI: 4.89-38.99; I2 = 65.8%), while cumulative positive and negative likelihood ratio (PLR and NLR) were 5.4 (95% CI: 2.3-11.2) and 0.37 (95% CI: 0.22-0.54), respectively. Conclusions: FNAC alone could not guide the decision to perform a salvage neck dissection in previously irradiated patients, but its results should be assessed in relation to the specific clinical context.
Accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology in detecting cervical node metastasis after radiotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis / Costantino, Andrea; Mercante, Giuseppe; D'Ascoli, Elisa; Ferreli, Fabio; Di Tommaso, Luca; Franzese, Ciro; Giannitto, Caterina; Casale, Manuele; Spriano, Giuseppe; De Virgilio, Armando. - In: HEAD & NECK. - ISSN 1043-3074. - 43:3(2021), pp. 987-996. [10.1002/HED.26536]
Accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology in detecting cervical node metastasis after radiotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis
De Virgilio, ArmandoUltimo
2021
Abstract
Purpose: To define the accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in diagnosing persistent or recurrent neck metastases in previously irradiated patients. Methods: The study was performed according to the PRISMA-DTA guidelines. Results: A total of 382 FNACs were used for calculation of diagnostic accuracy parameters. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity in detecting malignant nodes were 69.1% (95% CI: 56.3%-80.7%; I2 = 79.5%) and 84.2% (95% CI: 71.8%-93.5%; I2 = 87.0%), respectively. Cumulative diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 16.54 (95% CI: 4.89-38.99; I2 = 65.8%), while cumulative positive and negative likelihood ratio (PLR and NLR) were 5.4 (95% CI: 2.3-11.2) and 0.37 (95% CI: 0.22-0.54), respectively. Conclusions: FNAC alone could not guide the decision to perform a salvage neck dissection in previously irradiated patients, but its results should be assessed in relation to the specific clinical context.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Costantino_Accuracy of_2021.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
1.3 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.3 MB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.