There is a well-documented opportunity and need to incorporate biodiversity conservation priorities into REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) initiatives. This requires thorough monitoring of changes to biodiversity at appropriate temporal and spatial scales. A national forest inventory is one of the essential tools used to monitor carbon stock changes but can also be expanded to include biodiversity indicators. Here we analyse the progress and potential of 70 countries in monitoring primarily non-tree biodiversity using national forest inventories. Progress on national forest inventories among countries participating in REDD+ is variable: 11 countries have not started; 26 have started but do not include non-tree biodiversity indicators; the remaining 33 countries do include non-tree biodiversity indicators but use various methodological approaches, levels of detail and taxonomic groups. Very few of these provide comprehensive and accessible manuals or results, highlighting a need for greater transparency. The capacity of countries to fund ongoing national forest inventories is a constraining factor. Remote sensing technologies can help reduce costs for countries with limited monitoring capacity but the need to understand biodiversity variation at finer scales often limits the utility of such methods.

Progress on incorporating biodiversity monitoring in REDD+ through national forest inventories / Gillerot, L.; Grussu, G.; Condor-Golec, R.; Tavani, R.; Dargush, P.; Attorre, F.. - In: GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION. - ISSN 2351-9894. - 32:(2021). [10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01901]

Progress on incorporating biodiversity monitoring in REDD+ through national forest inventories

Attorre F.
2021

Abstract

There is a well-documented opportunity and need to incorporate biodiversity conservation priorities into REDD+ (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation) initiatives. This requires thorough monitoring of changes to biodiversity at appropriate temporal and spatial scales. A national forest inventory is one of the essential tools used to monitor carbon stock changes but can also be expanded to include biodiversity indicators. Here we analyse the progress and potential of 70 countries in monitoring primarily non-tree biodiversity using national forest inventories. Progress on national forest inventories among countries participating in REDD+ is variable: 11 countries have not started; 26 have started but do not include non-tree biodiversity indicators; the remaining 33 countries do include non-tree biodiversity indicators but use various methodological approaches, levels of detail and taxonomic groups. Very few of these provide comprehensive and accessible manuals or results, highlighting a need for greater transparency. The capacity of countries to fund ongoing national forest inventories is a constraining factor. Remote sensing technologies can help reduce costs for countries with limited monitoring capacity but the need to understand biodiversity variation at finer scales often limits the utility of such methods.
2021
biodiversity indicators; biodiversity safeguard; deforestation; measuring reporting and verification; national forest monitoring system; remote sensing
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Progress on incorporating biodiversity monitoring in REDD+ through national forest inventories / Gillerot, L.; Grussu, G.; Condor-Golec, R.; Tavani, R.; Dargush, P.; Attorre, F.. - In: GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION. - ISSN 2351-9894. - 32:(2021). [10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01901]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Gillerot_Progress-on-incorporating_2021.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.78 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.78 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1708622
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact