Abstract: Background: The Covid 19 pandemic might have impacted response to drug treatment in major depressive episode (MDE). We compared responses to three different antidepressant drugs, i.e., vortioxetine, sertraline, and trazodone, in outpatients with MDE during Major Depressive Dis- order (MDD), Bipolar Disorder (BD), or schizophrenia and related psychoses (SSOPDs) during two time periods, i.e., before and after suffering Covid-19-related trauma. Methods: We conducted an observational study on clinically stabilised for at least 6 months outpatients with MDE during the course of MDD (N=58), BD (N=33), or SSOPDs (N=51). Patients, whose base- line assessments of Montgomery-Åsberg Rating Scale (MADRS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (Ham-A), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Visual Analogue Scale for Craving (VAS-crav) and World Health Organization Quality of Life, Brief version (WHOQOL-BREF) were available, were re- cruited at the time they suffered Covid-19-related traumas. Fifty patients, prior to the pandemic, when they were clinically stable, were treated with 15 mg/die vortioxetine, 44 with 450 mg/die trazodone, and 48 with 150 mg/die sertraline. After experiencing a major Covid-19-related personal trauma, pa- tients showed clinical worsening which required dosage adjustment (20 mg/day vortioxetine; 600 mg/day trazodone, and 200 mg/day sertraline) and, for some of them, hospitalisation. Scores on the MADRS, Ham-A, BPRS, VAS-crav and WHOQOL-BREF were compared drug-wise and gender- wise with Student’s t test for continuous variables and χ2 for categorical variables. Results: The sample consisted of 142 outpatients (age, mean 39.63 ± 16.84; 70 men and 72 wom- en); women were older than men (mean age 43.18 ± 17.61 vs. 35.98 ± 15.30; p=0.01). The two gen- ders did not differ on other variables. For all treatments, worsening symptoms were observed at the time of trauma, followed by slow recovery with treatment readjustment. Trauma-related worsening in patients on vortioxetine was less intense than patients on the other two antidepressants and recovery was faster. All drugs were associated with an improvement in QoL. The vortioxetine group showed a lower hospitalisation rate (24%) than sertraline (35.4%) and trazodone (38.6%), but this was not significant (p=0.27). Conclusion: All drugs improved symptoms of Covid-19 trauma in patients with MDE, with vorti- oxetine showing a small advantage. No differences between vortioxetine, sertraline and trazodone were found as concerning the need for hospitalisation.

Differential response to three antidepressants in patients with major depressive episode who suffered covid-19-related trauma / De Filippis, S; Lombardozzi, G; Matrone, M; Amici, E; Trovini, G; Perrini, F; Di Giovanni, A; Giovanetti, V; Kotzalidis, Gd. - In: CURRENT NEUROPHARMACOLOGY. - ISSN 1570-159X. - 20:12(2022), pp. 2393-2407. [10.2174/1570159X20666220310122849]

Differential response to three antidepressants in patients with major depressive episode who suffered covid-19-related trauma

Lombardozzi G
;
Matrone M;Trovini G;
2022

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The Covid 19 pandemic might have impacted response to drug treatment in major depressive episode (MDE). We compared responses to three different antidepressant drugs, i.e., vortioxetine, sertraline, and trazodone, in outpatients with MDE during Major Depressive Dis- order (MDD), Bipolar Disorder (BD), or schizophrenia and related psychoses (SSOPDs) during two time periods, i.e., before and after suffering Covid-19-related trauma. Methods: We conducted an observational study on clinically stabilised for at least 6 months outpatients with MDE during the course of MDD (N=58), BD (N=33), or SSOPDs (N=51). Patients, whose base- line assessments of Montgomery-Åsberg Rating Scale (MADRS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (Ham-A), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Visual Analogue Scale for Craving (VAS-crav) and World Health Organization Quality of Life, Brief version (WHOQOL-BREF) were available, were re- cruited at the time they suffered Covid-19-related traumas. Fifty patients, prior to the pandemic, when they were clinically stable, were treated with 15 mg/die vortioxetine, 44 with 450 mg/die trazodone, and 48 with 150 mg/die sertraline. After experiencing a major Covid-19-related personal trauma, pa- tients showed clinical worsening which required dosage adjustment (20 mg/day vortioxetine; 600 mg/day trazodone, and 200 mg/day sertraline) and, for some of them, hospitalisation. Scores on the MADRS, Ham-A, BPRS, VAS-crav and WHOQOL-BREF were compared drug-wise and gender- wise with Student’s t test for continuous variables and χ2 for categorical variables. Results: The sample consisted of 142 outpatients (age, mean 39.63 ± 16.84; 70 men and 72 wom- en); women were older than men (mean age 43.18 ± 17.61 vs. 35.98 ± 15.30; p=0.01). The two gen- ders did not differ on other variables. For all treatments, worsening symptoms were observed at the time of trauma, followed by slow recovery with treatment readjustment. Trauma-related worsening in patients on vortioxetine was less intense than patients on the other two antidepressants and recovery was faster. All drugs were associated with an improvement in QoL. The vortioxetine group showed a lower hospitalisation rate (24%) than sertraline (35.4%) and trazodone (38.6%), but this was not significant (p=0.27). Conclusion: All drugs improved symptoms of Covid-19 trauma in patients with MDE, with vorti- oxetine showing a small advantage. No differences between vortioxetine, sertraline and trazodone were found as concerning the need for hospitalisation.
2022
covid-19; major depressive episode; vortioxetine; sertraline; trazodone; pandemic-related trauma; anxiety; quality of life; craving; substance use disorders; hospitalization
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Differential response to three antidepressants in patients with major depressive episode who suffered covid-19-related trauma / De Filippis, S; Lombardozzi, G; Matrone, M; Amici, E; Trovini, G; Perrini, F; Di Giovanni, A; Giovanetti, V; Kotzalidis, Gd. - In: CURRENT NEUROPHARMACOLOGY. - ISSN 1570-159X. - 20:12(2022), pp. 2393-2407. [10.2174/1570159X20666220310122849]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
DeFilippis_Differential-Response_2022.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: Versione in press
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Altra licenza (allegare)
Dimensione 569.68 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
569.68 kB Adobe PDF
DeFilippis_Differential-response_2022.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 4.05 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.05 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1708345
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 6
social impact