Different types of milk are used in the production of milk kefir, but little information is available on the release of potentially antioxidant exopolysaccharides (EPS). The aim of this study was to investigate whether the microbial dynamics and EPS release are dependent on the milk substrate. In our study, the inoculated microbial consortium was driven differently by each type of milk (cow, ewe, and goat). This was evident in the sugar consumption, organic acid production, free amino release, and EPS production. The amount and the composition of the secreted EPS varied depending on the milk type, with implications for the structure and functional properties of the EPS. The low EPS yield in ewe’s milk was associated with a higher lactic acid production and thus with the use of carbon sources oriented towards energy production. Depending on the milk used as substrate, the EPS showed different monosaccharide and FT-IR profiles, microstructures, and surface morphologies. These differences affected the antiradical properties and reducing power of the EPS. In particular, EPS extracted from cow’s milk had a higher antioxidant activity than other milk types, and the antioxidant activity was concentration dependent.

Comparison of milk kefirs obtained from cow’s, ewe’s and goat’s milk. Antioxidant role of microbial-derived exopolysaccharides / M’Hir, Sana; Ayed, Lamia; De Pasquale, Ilaria; Fanizza, Elisabetta; Zein Alabiden Tlais, Ali; Comparelli, Roberto; Verni, Michela; Latronico, Rosanna; Gobbetti, Marco; Di Cagno, Raffaella; Filannino, Pasquale. - In: ANTIOXIDANTS. - ISSN 2076-3921. - 13:3(2024), pp. 1-16. [10.3390/antiox13030335]

Comparison of milk kefirs obtained from cow’s, ewe’s and goat’s milk. Antioxidant role of microbial-derived exopolysaccharides

Michela Verni;
2024

Abstract

Different types of milk are used in the production of milk kefir, but little information is available on the release of potentially antioxidant exopolysaccharides (EPS). The aim of this study was to investigate whether the microbial dynamics and EPS release are dependent on the milk substrate. In our study, the inoculated microbial consortium was driven differently by each type of milk (cow, ewe, and goat). This was evident in the sugar consumption, organic acid production, free amino release, and EPS production. The amount and the composition of the secreted EPS varied depending on the milk type, with implications for the structure and functional properties of the EPS. The low EPS yield in ewe’s milk was associated with a higher lactic acid production and thus with the use of carbon sources oriented towards energy production. Depending on the milk used as substrate, the EPS showed different monosaccharide and FT-IR profiles, microstructures, and surface morphologies. These differences affected the antiradical properties and reducing power of the EPS. In particular, EPS extracted from cow’s milk had a higher antioxidant activity than other milk types, and the antioxidant activity was concentration dependent.
2024
monosaccharides; polysaccharides; antiradical; reducing power; ABTS; FRAP; DPPH; fermentation; metabolism; substrate
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Comparison of milk kefirs obtained from cow’s, ewe’s and goat’s milk. Antioxidant role of microbial-derived exopolysaccharides / M’Hir, Sana; Ayed, Lamia; De Pasquale, Ilaria; Fanizza, Elisabetta; Zein Alabiden Tlais, Ali; Comparelli, Roberto; Verni, Michela; Latronico, Rosanna; Gobbetti, Marco; Di Cagno, Raffaella; Filannino, Pasquale. - In: ANTIOXIDANTS. - ISSN 2076-3921. - 13:3(2024), pp. 1-16. [10.3390/antiox13030335]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
M’hir_Comparison-of-milk_2024 .pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.22 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.22 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1708290
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact