A recent and well known paper, Bove and Elia (2017), argues that migrants’ diversity, as capturedby the indexes of both fractionalization and polarization, exerts a positive effect on GDP growth. Infact, by using the same dataset and methodology, we show that the impact of diversity cannot bedistinguished from that of migration itself due to the very high correlation among the correspondingvariables. Also, if one disentangles migration from diversity, following Alesina et al. (2016), onlymigration maintains a positive impact on growth while diversity, as captured by fractionalization,turns out to be weakly and positively associated with growth, but limitedly to the 1980-2010 timespan. Polarization, on the other hand, does not seem to exert any effect on growth. The question as to whether diversity is more or less beneficial in terms of economic growth remains therefore an intriguing one, and calls for more theoretical and empirical analyses, possibly based on less (geographically) aggregated data

Migration, diversity, and economic growth. A replication study of Bove and Elia (World development, 2017) / BALSIMELLI GHELLI, Bianca; Ventura, Luigi. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR RE-VIEWS IN EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS. - ISSN 2566-8269. - 3:(2024). [10.15456/j1.2024093.1253206165]

Migration, diversity, and economic growth. A replication study of Bove and Elia (World development, 2017)

Bianca Balsimelli Ghelli;Luigi Ventura
2024

Abstract

A recent and well known paper, Bove and Elia (2017), argues that migrants’ diversity, as capturedby the indexes of both fractionalization and polarization, exerts a positive effect on GDP growth. Infact, by using the same dataset and methodology, we show that the impact of diversity cannot bedistinguished from that of migration itself due to the very high correlation among the correspondingvariables. Also, if one disentangles migration from diversity, following Alesina et al. (2016), onlymigration maintains a positive impact on growth while diversity, as captured by fractionalization,turns out to be weakly and positively associated with growth, but limitedly to the 1980-2010 timespan. Polarization, on the other hand, does not seem to exert any effect on growth. The question as to whether diversity is more or less beneficial in terms of economic growth remains therefore an intriguing one, and calls for more theoretical and empirical analyses, possibly based on less (geographically) aggregated data
2024
diversity; economic growth; migration
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Migration, diversity, and economic growth. A replication study of Bove and Elia (World development, 2017) / BALSIMELLI GHELLI, Bianca; Ventura, Luigi. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR RE-VIEWS IN EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS. - ISSN 2566-8269. - 3:(2024). [10.15456/j1.2024093.1253206165]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Balsimelli-Ghelli_Migration_2024.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 209.82 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
209.82 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1707724
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact