Objective: Early iatrogenic menopause in gynecological cancer survivors and BRCA mutation (BRCAm) carriers undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is a major health concern. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is the most effective remedy, but remains underused in clinical practice. The Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer and gynecologic malignancies (MITO) group promoted a national survey to investigate the knowledge and attitudes of healthcare professionals regarding the prescription of HRT. Methods: The survey consisted of a self-administered, multiple-choice 45-item questionnaire, available online to all MITO members for 2 months starting from January 2022. Results: A total of 61 participants completed the questionnaire (47 out of 180 MITO centers; compliance: 26.1%). Most respondents were female (73.8%), younger than 50 years (65.6%), and gynecologic oncologists (55.7%), working in public general hospitals (49.2%). An 84.4% of specialists actively discuss HRT with patients and 51.0% of patients ask the specialist for an opinion on HRT. The rate of specialists globally in favor of prescribing HRT was 22.9% for ovarian cancer, 49.1% for cervical cancer, and 8.2% for endometrial cancer patients. Most respondents (70.5%) believe HRT is safe for BRCA-mutated patients after RRSO. Nearly 70% of physicians prescribe systemic HRT, while 23.8% prefer local HRT. Most specialists recommend HRT for as long as there is a benefit and generally for up to 5 years. Conclusion: Real-world data suggest that many healthcare professionals still do not easily prescribe HRT for gynecological cancer survivors and BRCA mutation carriers after RRSO. Further efforts are required to implement the use of HRT in clinical practice and to support both clinicians in recommending HRT and patients in accepting it.

Hormone replacement therapy in gynecological cancer survivors and BRCA mutation carriers: a MITO group survey / Palaia, Innocenza; Caruso, Giuseppe; Di Donato, Violante; Turetta, Camilla; Savarese, Antonella; Perniola, Giorgia; Gallo, Roberta; Giannini, Andrea; Salutari, Vanda; Bogani, Giorgio; Tomao, Federica; Giannarelli, Diana; Gentile, Gabriella; Musella, Angela; Muzii, Ludovico; Pignata, Sandro. - In: JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 2005-0380. - 35:3(2024). [10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e70]

Hormone replacement therapy in gynecological cancer survivors and BRCA mutation carriers: a MITO group survey

Palaia, Innocenza;Caruso, Giuseppe
;
Di Donato, Violante;Turetta, Camilla;Perniola, Giorgia;Gallo, Roberta;Giannini, Andrea;Bogani, Giorgio;Tomao, Federica;Musella, Angela;Muzii, Ludovico;
2024

Abstract

Objective: Early iatrogenic menopause in gynecological cancer survivors and BRCA mutation (BRCAm) carriers undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is a major health concern. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is the most effective remedy, but remains underused in clinical practice. The Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian cancer and gynecologic malignancies (MITO) group promoted a national survey to investigate the knowledge and attitudes of healthcare professionals regarding the prescription of HRT. Methods: The survey consisted of a self-administered, multiple-choice 45-item questionnaire, available online to all MITO members for 2 months starting from January 2022. Results: A total of 61 participants completed the questionnaire (47 out of 180 MITO centers; compliance: 26.1%). Most respondents were female (73.8%), younger than 50 years (65.6%), and gynecologic oncologists (55.7%), working in public general hospitals (49.2%). An 84.4% of specialists actively discuss HRT with patients and 51.0% of patients ask the specialist for an opinion on HRT. The rate of specialists globally in favor of prescribing HRT was 22.9% for ovarian cancer, 49.1% for cervical cancer, and 8.2% for endometrial cancer patients. Most respondents (70.5%) believe HRT is safe for BRCA-mutated patients after RRSO. Nearly 70% of physicians prescribe systemic HRT, while 23.8% prefer local HRT. Most specialists recommend HRT for as long as there is a benefit and generally for up to 5 years. Conclusion: Real-world data suggest that many healthcare professionals still do not easily prescribe HRT for gynecological cancer survivors and BRCA mutation carriers after RRSO. Further efforts are required to implement the use of HRT in clinical practice and to support both clinicians in recommending HRT and patients in accepting it.
2024
hormone replacement therapy; menopause; ovarian neoplasms; surgery; survivors; uterine neoplasms
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Hormone replacement therapy in gynecological cancer survivors and BRCA mutation carriers: a MITO group survey / Palaia, Innocenza; Caruso, Giuseppe; Di Donato, Violante; Turetta, Camilla; Savarese, Antonella; Perniola, Giorgia; Gallo, Roberta; Giannini, Andrea; Salutari, Vanda; Bogani, Giorgio; Tomao, Federica; Giannarelli, Diana; Gentile, Gabriella; Musella, Angela; Muzii, Ludovico; Pignata, Sandro. - In: JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 2005-0380. - 35:3(2024). [10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e70]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Palaia_Hormone-replacement_2024.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.46 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.46 MB Adobe PDF
Palaia_Hormone-replacement_2024.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.93 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.93 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1706454
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact